Long-term survival in obese patients after robotic or open surgery for endometrial cancer

被引:18
|
作者
Lindfors, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Heshar, Heshoo [1 ,2 ]
Adok, Claudia [3 ]
Sundfeldt, Karin [1 ,2 ]
Dahm-Kahler, Pernilla [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Reg Canc Ctr Western Sweden, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Obesity; Robotic surgery; Long-term survival; Disease-free survival; Prognostic factors; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; UTERINE-CANCER; OUTCOMES; CARCINOMA; HYSTERECTOMY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.684
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate surgical outcomes and survival after primary robotic or open surgery in obese women with endometrial cancer (EC). Methods. The study included obese women (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)) with EC who underwent primary surgery before and after the introduction of robotics between 2006 and 2014. Data on complications, survival, and recurrence was obtained through the National Cancer Registry and medical files. Survival curves were calculated for overall (OS), relative (RS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Cox proportional hazards regression models to assess OS and DFS. Results. In total, 217 patients were identified, 131 robotic and 86 open surgical procedures. Significantly lower estimated blood loss, surgical time and hospital stay were found in the robotic group and the relative risk ratio of complications grades II-V, using the Clavien Dindo classification, was 0.54 (95% CI 0.31-0.93) for the robotic compared to the open group. A significant difference in OS (p = 0.029) and RS (p = 0.024) in favor of robotics was shown in the univariable survival curves, using log rank tests. No difference was seen for DFS. The 5-year RS was 96.2% (95% CI 89.7-103.3) for the robotic and 81.6% (95% CI 72.1-92.3) for the open group. Multivariable analysis showed high risk histology to be an independent risk factor, for both OS (HR 2.90; 95% CI 1.42-5.93; p < 0.05) and DFS (HR 2.74; 95% CI 1.45-5.17; p < 0.05). Robotic surgery was not found a significant independent factor for survival. Conclusions. Robotic surgery in obese women with EC had equivalent long-term and disease-free survival compared to open with significantly less complications, lower estimated blood loss, shorter surgical time and hospital stay. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 680
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surgical Outcome of Robotic Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patient With Endometrial Cancer Compared to Laparotomy
    Bernardini, Marcus Q.
    Gien, Lilian T.
    Tipping, Helen
    Murphy, Joan
    Rosen, Barry P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2012, 22 (01) : 76 - 81
  • [42] Comparing oncological outcomes of robotic versus open surgery in the treatment of endometrial cancer
    Nikolopoulos, Manolis
    Pickering, Mark
    Thu, Khaing Thu
    Mitsopoulos, Vasileios
    Pandraklakis, Anastasios
    Lippiatt, Jonathan
    Innamaa, Anni
    Biliatis, Ioannis
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (05) : 2631 - 2637
  • [43] Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer
    Holloway, Robert W.
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 38 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [44] Robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: first Polish experience
    Bizon, Magdalena
    Olszewski, Maciej
    Grabowska, Agnieszka
    Mawlichanow, Krzysztof
    Pilka, Radovan
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [45] The Role of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer
    O'Malley, David M.
    Smith, Blair
    Fowler, Jeffrey M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 112 (07) : 761 - 768
  • [46] Long-term survival after multimodality therapy including surgery for metastatic esophageal cancer
    Van Daele, Elke
    Scuderi, Vincenzo
    Pape, Eva
    Van De Putte, Dirk
    Varin, Oswald
    Van Nieuwenhove, Yves
    Ceelen, Wim
    Troisi, Roberto
    Pattyn, Piet
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2018, 118 (04) : 227 - 232
  • [47] Long-term survival of patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer after multimodal treatment
    Lee, Haejun
    Kim, Soo Young
    Kim, Seok-Mo
    Chang, Ho-Jin
    Lee, Yong Sang
    Park, Cheong Soo
    Chang, Hang-Seok
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (09) : 5430 - 5436
  • [48] Reoperation after oesophageal cancer surgery in relation to long-term survival: a population-based cohort study
    van der Schaaf, Maartje
    Derogar, Maryam
    Johar, Asif
    Rutegard, Martin
    Gossage, James
    Mason, Robert
    Lagergren, Pernilla
    Lagergren, Jesper
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (03):
  • [49] Long-term outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer
    Praiss, Aaron M.
    Huang, Yongmei
    St Clair, Caryn M.
    Melamed, Alexander
    Khoury-Collado, Fady
    Hou, June Y.
    Gockley, Allison
    Hillyer, Grace C.
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    Wright, Jason D.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 164 (01) : 105 - 112
  • [50] Robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: A review
    Capmas, P.
    Bats, A. -S.
    Bensaid, C.
    Bady, J.
    Lecuru, F.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2012, 41 (03): : 219 - 226