Long-term survival in obese patients after robotic or open surgery for endometrial cancer

被引:18
|
作者
Lindfors, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Heshar, Heshoo [1 ,2 ]
Adok, Claudia [3 ]
Sundfeldt, Karin [1 ,2 ]
Dahm-Kahler, Pernilla [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Reg Canc Ctr Western Sweden, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Obesity; Robotic surgery; Long-term survival; Disease-free survival; Prognostic factors; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; UTERINE-CANCER; OUTCOMES; CARCINOMA; HYSTERECTOMY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.684
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate surgical outcomes and survival after primary robotic or open surgery in obese women with endometrial cancer (EC). Methods. The study included obese women (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)) with EC who underwent primary surgery before and after the introduction of robotics between 2006 and 2014. Data on complications, survival, and recurrence was obtained through the National Cancer Registry and medical files. Survival curves were calculated for overall (OS), relative (RS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Cox proportional hazards regression models to assess OS and DFS. Results. In total, 217 patients were identified, 131 robotic and 86 open surgical procedures. Significantly lower estimated blood loss, surgical time and hospital stay were found in the robotic group and the relative risk ratio of complications grades II-V, using the Clavien Dindo classification, was 0.54 (95% CI 0.31-0.93) for the robotic compared to the open group. A significant difference in OS (p = 0.029) and RS (p = 0.024) in favor of robotics was shown in the univariable survival curves, using log rank tests. No difference was seen for DFS. The 5-year RS was 96.2% (95% CI 89.7-103.3) for the robotic and 81.6% (95% CI 72.1-92.3) for the open group. Multivariable analysis showed high risk histology to be an independent risk factor, for both OS (HR 2.90; 95% CI 1.42-5.93; p < 0.05) and DFS (HR 2.74; 95% CI 1.45-5.17; p < 0.05). Robotic surgery was not found a significant independent factor for survival. Conclusions. Robotic surgery in obese women with EC had equivalent long-term and disease-free survival compared to open with significantly less complications, lower estimated blood loss, shorter surgical time and hospital stay. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 680
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robotic vs Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer in Elderly Patients: Surgical Outcome, Survival, and Cost Analysis
    Lindfors, Anna
    Akesson, Asa
    Staf, Christian
    Sjoli, Per
    Sundfeldt, Karin
    Dahm-Kahler, Pernilla
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 (04) : 692 - 699
  • [22] The roles and limitations of robotic surgery for obese endometrial cancer patients: a common challenge in gynecologic oncology
    Shemshedini T.
    Pradhan T.S.
    Pua T.L.
    Tedjarati S.S.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2015, 9 (2) : 109 - 116
  • [23] Robotic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in Obese Patients With Comorbidities Evaluating Postoperative Complications
    Backes, Floor J.
    Rosen, Maggie
    Liang, Margaret
    McCann, Georgia A.
    Clements, Aine
    Cohn, David E.
    O'Malley, David M.
    Salani, Ritu
    Fowler, Jeffrey M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (07) : 1271 - 1276
  • [24] Long-term outcome in endometrial cancer patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery with sentinel lymph node mapping
    Nordskar, Nina Jebens
    Hagen, Bjorn
    Vesterfjell, Ellen V.
    Salvesen, Oyvind
    Aune, Guro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 271 : 77 - 82
  • [25] Predictors of Long-Term Survival after Renal Cancer Surgery
    Zabell, Joseph
    Demirjian, Sevag
    Lane, Brian R.
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    Isharwal, Sudhir
    Suk-Ouichai, Chalairat
    Wu, Jitao
    Palacios, Diego Aguilar
    Campbell, Steven C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (02) : 384 - 391
  • [26] Value of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer by body mass index
    Gracia, Myriam
    Garcia-Santos, Javier
    Ramirez, Mar
    Bellon, Monica
    Herraiz, Miguel A.
    Coronado, Pluvio J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 150 (03) : 398 - 405
  • [27] Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer
    Gocmen, Ahmet
    Sanlikan, Fatih
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 8 (04) : 130 - 135
  • [28] Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic staging surgery in treating endometrial cancer: 20 years of follow-up
    Lee, Chyi-Long
    Kusunoki, Soshi
    Huang, Kuan-Gen
    Wu, Kai-Yun
    Huang, Chen-Yin
    Yen, Chih-Feng
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 55 (04): : 545 - 551
  • [29] Robotic vs. laparoscopic approach in obese patients with endometrial cancer: which is the best? A mini-review
    D'Auge, Tullio Golia
    Cuccu, Ilaria
    De Angelis, Emanuele
    Buzzaccarini, Giovanni
    D'Oria, Ottavia
    Besharat, Aris Raad
    Caserta, Donatella
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Di Donato, Violante
    Giannini, Andrea
    ONCOLOGIE, 2024, 26 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [30] Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis
    Corrado, Giacomo
    Vizza, Enrico
    Cela, Vito
    Mereu, Liliana
    Bogliolo, Stefano
    Legge, Francesco
    Ciccarone, Francesca
    Mancini, Emanuela
    Gallotta, Valerio
    Baiocco, Ermelinda
    Monterossi, Giorgia
    Perri, Maria Teresa
    Zampa, Ashanti
    Pasciuto, Tina
    Scambia, Giovanni
    EJSO, 2018, 44 (12): : 1935 - 1941