A Laplacian approach to stubborn agents and their role in opinion formation on influence networks

被引:18
作者
Baumann, Fabian [1 ]
Sokolov, Igor M. [1 ,2 ]
Tyloo, Melvyn [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Inst Phys, Newtonstr 15, D-12481 Berlin, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, IRIS Adlershof, Newtonstr 15, D-12481 Berlin, Germany
[3] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne EPFL, Inst Phys, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Univ Appl Sci Western Switzerland HES SO, Sch Engn, CH-1951 Sion, Switzerland
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Laplacian; Networks; Stubborn agents; Opinion formation; Resistance distance; RESISTANCE-DISTANCE; DYNAMICS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2020.124869
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Within the framework of a simple model for social influence, the Taylor model, we analytically investigate the role of stubborn agents in the overall opinion dynamics of networked systems. Similar to zealots, stubborn agents are biased towards a certain opinion and have a major effect on the collective opinion formation process. Based on a modified version of the network Laplacian we derive quantities capturing the transient dynamics of the system and the emerging stationary opinion states. In the case of a single stubborn agent we characterize his/her ability to coherently change a prevailing consensus. For two antagonistic stubborn agents we investigate the opinion heterogeneity of the emerging non-consensus states and describe their statistical properties using a graph metric similar to the resistance distance in electrical networks. Applying the model to synthetic and empirical networks we find while opinion diversity is decreased by small-worldness and favored in the case of a pronounced community structure the opposite is true for the coherence of opinions during a consensus change. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Abelson R.P., 1964, Contrib. Math. Psychol.
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1958, Journal of Conflict Resolution, DOI [DOI 10.1177/002200275800200106, 10.1177/002200275800200106]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 29 AAAI C ART INT
[4]   Opinions, influence, and zealotry: a computational study on stubbornness [J].
Arendt, Dustin L. ;
Blaha, Leslie M. .
COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL ORGANIZATION THEORY, 2015, 21 (02) :184-209
[5]   Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization [J].
Bail, Christopher A. ;
Argyle, Lisa P. ;
Brown, Taylor W. ;
Bumpus, John P. ;
Chen, Haohan ;
Hunzaker, M. B. Fallin ;
Lee, Jaemin ;
Mann, Marcus ;
Merhout, Friedolin ;
Volfovsky, Alexander .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (37) :9216-9221
[6]   Opinion polarization by learning from social feedback [J].
Banisch, S. ;
Olbrich, E. .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 43 (02) :76-103
[7]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[8]   The emergence of consensus: a primer [J].
Baronchelli, Andrea .
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2018, 5 (02)
[9]   Axioms for Centrality [J].
Boldi, Paolo ;
Vigna, Sebastiano .
INTERNET MATHEMATICS, 2014, 10 (3-4) :222-262
[10]   Statistical physics of social dynamics [J].
Castellano, Claudio ;
Fortunato, Santo ;
Loreto, Vittorio .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81 (02) :591-646