Prediction of maternal predisposition to preeclampsia

被引:14
作者
Emonts, Patrick [1 ]
Seaksan, Sontera [1 ]
Seidel, Laurence [2 ]
Thoumsin, Henri [1 ]
Gaspard, Ulysse [1 ]
Albert, Adelin [2 ]
Foidart, Jean-Michel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Ctr Hosp Reg Citadelle, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] Univ Liege, CHU Sart Tilman, Dept Biostat, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
关键词
preeclampsia; hypertension; thrombophilia; screening; prenatal care;
D O I
10.1080/10641950802000901
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To derive a prediction index based on the most salient patient history, laboratory, and clinical parameters for identifying women at high risk for developing preeclampsia (PE). Methods: Nonpregnant women with a history of PE (n = 101) were compared with nonpregnant parous women with a history of one or more successful normotensive pregnancies (n = 50) but with comparable age, gestation, and parity profiles. The parameters included a medical examination (demographics, patient history, family history, and clinical and obstetrical findings), laboratory investigations (hemostasis, coagulation, and vitamins), and morphological and functional tests (cardiovascular and renal functions). Stepwise logistic regression analysis was applied to develop a three-step PE prediction index based on the most discriminant parameters. Results: Patients with and without PE differed significantly (p < 0.05) with respect to 1) maternal history of chronic hypertension, body mass index, and blood pressure; 2) APTT, PT, activated factor VIII, homocystein, free protein S and vitamin B1; and 3) relative plasma volume. Based on these three sets of parameters, a three-step PE prediction index was developed. The likelihood ratio of a positive index score was equal to 3.4, 7.3, and 8.8, respectively. Thus, assuming a PE prevalence (or prior probability) of 5%, a patient's chances of developing PE when presenting with a positive score on the three-step prediction index were 15%, 28%, and 32%, respectively. Discussion: In the absence of welldefined pre-pregnancy screening guidelines for PE, the present study attempts to proceed in a stepwise fashion by looking at medical examination data first, requesting, if necessary, specific hemostasis and coagulation tests next, and finally measuring the relative plasma volume for confirmatory purposes. This approach offers a satisfactory positive predictive value and cost efficiency ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 245
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   How strong is the association between maternal thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcome? A systematic review [J].
Alfirevic, Z ;
Roberts, D ;
Martlew, V .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 101 (01) :6-14
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CONFIDENTIAL ENQUIRI
[3]   Screening for pre-eclampsia: the quest for the Holy Grail? [J].
Audibert, F .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9468) :1367-1369
[4]   PLASMA AND RED-CELL VOLUMES DURING PREGNANCY [J].
CHESLEY, LC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1972, 112 (03) :440-+
[5]   World Health Organization systematic review of screening tests for preeclampsia [J].
Conde-Agudelo, A ;
Villar, J ;
Lindheimer, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (06) :1367-1391
[6]  
COTTER A, 2001, 21 ANN M SOC MAT FET
[7]  
CUNNINGHAM FG, 2001, WILLIAMS OBSTET, P177
[8]   Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies [J].
Duckitt, K ;
Harrington, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7491) :565-567
[9]   Recurrent pregnancy loss with antiphospholipid antibody: A systematic review of therapeutic trials [J].
Empson, M ;
Lassere, M ;
Craig, JC ;
Scott, JR .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (01) :135-144
[10]   Thromboembolic disease in pregnancy [J].
Gates, S .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 12 (02) :117-122