Concepts of power in boundary spanning research: A review and research agenda

被引:25
作者
Collien, Isabel [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
INFORMATION; ROLES; WORK; KNOWLEDGE; OBJECTS; GOVERNMENTALITY; ORGANIZATION; PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1111/ijmr.12251
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This meta-analytic review of power-sensitive boundary spanning research provides strong evidence that power enables, broadens and limits boundary spanning practices and outcomes. Boundary spanners use power bases to drive innovation and empower others to maintain cross-cultural collaboration, while altering unequal power relations that hinder learning and knowledge-sharing in organizations. The review further points to avenues for future research on power in boundary spanning processes: future boundary spanning studies would profit from strengthening a relational, social-constructivist understanding of power bases. This encompasses accounting for the power bases of all actors involved, expanding the notion of power bases to demographic diversity of gender, race or class, or showing how the relative importance of power bases is constructed within fields. Boundary spanning research would also benefit from expanding postcolonial and poststructuralist perspectives, which provide tools to detect subtle workings of power in boundary spanning processes. This may alter theoretical and practical implications, for example when boundary objects associated with transparency and freedom may be presented as limiting boundary spanners' field of action.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 465
页数:23
相关论文
共 167 条
[1]   From boundary spanning to creolization: A study of Chinese software and services outsourcing vendors [J].
Abbott, Pamela ;
Zheng, Yingqin ;
Du, Rong ;
Willcocks, Leslie .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2013, 22 (02) :121-136
[2]  
Abel C.F., 2002, Administrative Theory and Process, V24, P253
[3]   Doing Diversity INTRODUCTION [J].
Ahmed, Sara ;
Swan, Elaine .
POLICY FUTURES IN EDUCATION, 2006, 4 (02) :96-100
[4]  
Aldrich H.E., 1979, ORG ENV
[5]  
Aldrich Howard., 1977, The Academy of Management Review, V2, P217, DOI [10.2307/257905, DOI 10.2307/257905, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1977.4409044]
[6]   Power, subjectivity, and agency: Between Arendt and Foucault [J].
Allen, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2002, 10 (02) :131-149
[7]  
Allen A., 2016, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Fall 2016
[8]  
Alvesson M., 1996, HDB ORG STUDIES, P191
[9]   BRIDGING THE BOUNDARY - EXTERNAL ACTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS [J].
ANCONA, DG ;
CALDWELL, DF .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 37 (04) :634-665
[10]  
Arendt H., 1958, The human condition