Review of closed dressings after laser resurfacing

被引:17
作者
Newman, JP [1 ]
Fitzgerald, P [1 ]
Koch, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99071.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Laser skin resurfacing has become an accepted technique for the treatment of facial rhytides and associated solar skin damage. Achieving a successful result is directly related to proper postoperative wound care during the reepithelialization process. There are open and closed approaches to the treatment of the post-laser resurfacing patient with distinct advantages and disadvantages. OBJECTIVE. To review the most commonly used closed dressings after facial laser skin resurfacing and compare their advantages and disadvantages. To compare clinical findings with a group of patients treated exclusively with an open technique. METHODS. Review of composite foams, polymer film, polymer mesh, and hydrogel products and prospective observations of clinical outcomes of patients treated with each dressing category after facial laser skin resurfacing. We perform a retrospective charr review of a group of patients treated exclusively with an open technique comparing crust formation, comfort, and pruritus with the prospective group of patients treated with closed dressings. RESULTS. The closed dressings available today each have unique structural configurations and adhesive properties intended to maintain an occlusive wound environment. Patient acceptance of these dressings was favorable, with improved comfort compared to the open dressing group. Complications of bacterial infections and contact dermatitis were not observed when closed dressings were used with a protocol for dressing changes performed at 48 hours. Rates of reepithelialization did not vary according to dressing category. Crust formation and postoperative pruritus occurred less frequently when closed occlusive dressings were worn by patients. CONCLUSIONS. When used properly, these dressings improve patient comfort, simplify their postoperative wound care, and do not increase the risk of infection or contact dermatitis. Overall satisfaction was highest with perforated mesh and polymer dressings for full-face wounds.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 571
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Delayed infections following full-face CO2 laser resurfacing and occlusive dressing use [J].
Christian, MM ;
Behroozan, DS ;
Moy, RL .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2000, 26 (01) :32-36
[2]   OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS [J].
EAGLSTEIN, WH .
JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 19 (08) :716-720
[3]   HYDROCOLLOID DRESSING (DUODERM) FOR THE TREATMENT OF SUPERFICIAL AND DEEP PARTIAL THICKNESS BURNS [J].
HERMANS, MHE .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 1987, 21 (03) :283-285
[4]  
HINMAN CD, 1963, NATURE, V200, P377, DOI [10.1038/200377a0, 10.1038/200378a0]
[5]   Use of biobrane after laser resurfacing [J].
Levy, PM ;
Salomon, D .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1998, 24 (07) :729-734
[6]   A NEW PRIMARY WOUND DRESSING MADE OF POLYETHYLENE OXIDE GEL [J].
MANDY, SH .
JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1983, 9 (02) :153-155
[7]   Complications of cutaneous laser surgery - A review [J].
Nanni, CA ;
Alster, TS .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1998, 24 (02) :209-219
[8]   Closed dressings after laser skin resurfacing [J].
Newman, JP ;
Koch, J ;
Goode, RL .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1998, 124 (07) :751-757
[9]   Wound care after laser skin resurfacing - A combination of open and closed methods using a new polyethylene mask [J].
Ruiz-Esparza, J ;
Gomez, JMB ;
de la Torre, OLG .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1998, 24 (01) :79-81
[10]  
SCHILLING RSF, 1950, LANCET, V258, P293