Strategic attention and decision control support prospective memory in a complex dual-task environment

被引:43
作者
Boag, Russell J. [1 ]
Strickland, Luke [1 ]
Loft, Shayne [1 ]
Heathcote, Andrew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Cognitive control; Cognitive capacity; Prospective memory; Selective attention; Multi-tasking; Bayesian evidence accumulation model; AIR-TRAFFIC-CONTROL; SPEED-ACCURACY TRADEOFF; COGNITIVE CONTROL; CONFLICT DETECTION; MODEL; TIME; INTERRUPTIONS; INTERFERENCE; RETRIEVAL; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.011
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Human performance in complex multiple-task environments depends critically on the interplay between cognitive control and cognitive capacity. In this paper we propose a tractable computational model of how cognitive control and capacity influence the speed and accuracy of decisions made in the event-based prospective memory (PM) paradigm, and in doing so test a new quantitative formulation that measures two distinct components of cognitive capacity (gain and focus) that apply generally to choices among two or more options. Consistent with prior work, individuals used proactive control (increased ongoing task thresholds under PM load) and reactive control (inhibited ongoing task accumulation rates to PM items) to support PM performance. Individuals used cognitive gain to increase the amount of resources allocated to the ongoing task under time pressure and PM load. However, when demands exceeded the capacity limit, resources were reallocated (shared) between ongoing task and PM processes. Extending previous work, individuals used cognitive focus to control the quality of processing for the ongoing and PM tasks based on the particular demand and payoff structure of the environment (e.g., higher focus for higher priority tasks; lower focus under high time pressure and with PM load). Our model provides the first detailed quantitative understanding of cognitive gain and focus as they apply to evidence accumulation models, which - along with cognitive control mechanisms - support decision-making in complex multiple-task environments.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 143 条
[111]   Modeling response times for two-choice decisions [J].
Ratcliff, R ;
Rouder, JN .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (05) :347-356
[112]   THEORY OF MEMORY RETRIEVAL [J].
RATCLIFF, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 85 (02) :59-108
[113]   Modeling simple driving tasks with a one-boundary diffusion model [J].
Ratcliff, Roger ;
Strayer, David .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2014, 21 (03) :577-589
[114]   Perceptual Discrimination in Static and Dynamic Noise: The Temporal Relation Between Perceptual Encoding and Decision Making [J].
Ratcliff, Roger ;
Smith, Philip L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2010, 139 (01) :70-94
[115]  
Reason J., 1991, HUMAN ERROR
[116]   The Normalization Model of Attention [J].
Reynolds, John H. ;
Heeger, David J. .
NEURON, 2009, 61 (02) :168-185
[117]   Dealing With Prospective Memory Demands While Performing an Ongoing Task: Shared Processing, Increased On-Task Focus, or Both? [J].
Rummel, Jan ;
Smeekens, Bridget A. ;
Kane, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2017, 43 (07) :1047-1062
[118]   Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control [J].
Schwartz, O ;
Simoncelli, EP .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 4 (08) :819-825
[119]   The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: Evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability [J].
Scullin, Michael K. ;
McDaniel, Mark A. ;
Shelton, Jill Talley .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 67 (1-2) :55-71
[120]   Whoops, I Did It Again: Commission Errors in Prospective Memory [J].
Scullin, Michael K. ;
Bugg, Julie M. ;
McDaniel, Mark A. .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2012, 27 (01) :46-53