Using of high-resolution topsoil magnetic screening for assessment of dust deposition: comparison of forest and arable soil datasets

被引:42
作者
Magiera, T.
Zawadzki, J.
机构
[1] Inst Environm Engn PAS, PL-41819 Zabrze, Poland
[2] Warsaw Univ Technol, PL-00661 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
basic statistic; magnetic susceptibility; soil pollution; topsoil; semivariances;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-006-9235-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Magnetic susceptibility (kappa) is an easily detectable geophysical parameter that can be used as a proxy or semi-quantitative tracer of atmospheric industrial and urban dusts deposited in topsoil. An enhanced kappa value of topsoil is in many cases also associated with high concentrations of soil pollutants (mostly heavy metals). High-resolution magnetic screening of topsoil in areas of high pollution influx is a useful tool for detection of pollution "hot spots". General and regional screening maps with a grid density of 10 or 5 km have been performed on the basis of forest topsoil measurement only. The purpose of this study was to perform high-resolution magnetic screening with different grid densities in both forested and agricultural areas (arable land). Our large study area (ca. 200 km(2)) was located in a relatively more polluted region of the central part of Upper Silesia, and a second (small) one (ca. 100 m(2)) was located in the western part of Upper Silesia, with considerably lower influx of pollution. In the framework of this study, we applied a statistical comparison of data obtained in forested areas and on arable land. The arable soil showed statistically significantly lower kappa values, the result of "physical dilution" of the arable layer caused by annual ploughing. Thus arable soils must be avoided during high-resolution field measurement. From semivariograms, it was clear that the spatial correlations in forest topsoil are much stronger than in arable soil, which suggests that a denser measurement grid is required in forested areas.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 28
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GEOSTAT NATURAL RESO
[2]  
DEUTSCH CV, 1998, GSLIB GEOSTAT SOFTWA
[3]   CRYSTALLINE COMPONENTS OF STACK-COLLECTED, SIZE-FRACTIONATED COAL FLY-ASH [J].
HANSEN, LD ;
SILBERMAN, D ;
FISHER, GL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 15 (09) :1057-1062
[4]   Magnetic record of industrial pollution in forest soils of Upper Silesia, Poland [J].
Heller, F ;
Strzyszcz, Z ;
Magiera, T .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1998, 103 (B8) :17767-17774
[5]   CHEMICAL-SPECIES IN FLY-ASH FROM COAL-BURNING POWER-PLANTS [J].
HULETT, LD ;
WEINBERGER, AJ ;
NORTHCUTT, KJ ;
FERGUSON, M .
SCIENCE, 1980, 210 (4476) :1356-1358
[6]  
ISAAKS EH, 1989, INTRO APPL GEOSTAT
[7]  
KANJI GK, 1993, STAT TESTS
[8]   Proxy mapping of fly-ash pollution of soils around a coal-burning power plant:: a case study in the Czech Republic [J].
Kapicka, A ;
Petrovsky, E ;
Ustjak, S ;
Machácková, K .
JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 1999, 66 (1-2) :291-297
[9]   Sampling the soil in long-term forest plots: The implications of spatial variation [J].
Kirwan, N ;
Oliver, MA ;
Moffat, AJ ;
Morgan, GW .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2005, 111 (1-3) :149-172
[10]  
MAGIERA T, 2002, MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBIL