Bowel Cleansing Agents in Clinical Practice: A Cross-Sectional Study on Safety, Efficacy, and Predictor of Good Bowel Preparation

被引:2
|
作者
Joshi, Vivek [1 ]
Jain, Mayank [1 ]
Srinivas, M. [1 ]
Mahadevan, B. [1 ]
Kumar, G. S. Sameer [1 ]
Ganesh, P. [2 ]
Reddy, Alla Siddharth [2 ]
Venkataraman, Jayanthi [1 ]
机构
[1] Gleneagles Global Hlth City, Dept Gastroenterol, Chennai 600100, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Sri Ramchandra Med Coll, Dept Gastroenterol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Bowel; cleansing; colonoscopy; polyethylene glycol; ORAL SULFATE-SOLUTION; POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; MAGNESIUM CITRATE; TASK-FORCE; COLONOSCOPY; SOCIETY; QUALITY; LAVAGE; PICOSULFATE; VOLUME;
D O I
10.4103/jde.JDE_71_18
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A good bowel preparation for colonoscopy is the most important factor that has an impact on visualization and outcome of the procedure. Aim: The primary aim of the study was to assess the quality of bowel preparation as reported by the Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS). The secondary aim of the study was to analyze the patient feedback on ease of administration, palatability, and side effects with the bowel preparation. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing colonoscopy between March 2018 and September 2018 were enrolled in the study. Patients <18 years of age, those with the previous history of colorectal surgery, emergency procedures in an unprepared colon, and those not willing to participate were excluded from the study. Colon preparation of the patient was decided by senior consultants. A predesigned pro forma that included demography, indication for the procedure, preparation details, dietary recommendations the previous day if any, side effects, and patient's comfort to preparation was completed by two-independent observers. The BBPS was used to assess the bowel preparation. A score of <5 was deemed inadequate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study cohort consisted of 141 patients, of which 78 were male (55.3%). Eighty (56.7%) patients received oral sulfate-based preparation and 61 (43.4%) polyethylene glycol-based preparation. Nearly one third of cases reported the solution to be non palatable. 15.4% respondents reported nausea, vomiting and bloating as the major side effects of the preparation. The median duration of colonoscopy was 25 min (8-45 min). One hundred and eighteen patients (83.6%) had a BBPS score of >= 5. Sulfate preparation resulted in better bowel cleansing (P = 0.01). Age, gender, and dosing schedule of preparation, including bedtime dosing of stimulant laxative, did not alter the BBPS score. Conclusion: Sulfate- and polyethylene glycol-based preparations are commonly used for cleansing the colon. Bowel cleansing was adequate in most patients and sulfate-based yielded better bowel cleansing. Nearly 15.4% of patients reported side effects to these preparations.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 43
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, Bowel Movement Kinetics, and Patient Tolerability of Same-Day and Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Using 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Seo, Myeongsook
    Gweon, Tae-Geun
    Huh, Cheal Wung
    Ji, Jeong Seon
    Choi, Hwang
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (12) : 1518 - 1527
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of bowel cleansing solutions for colonoscopy: a prospective observational study
    Allegretti, A.
    Bargallo Carulla, D.
    Bertele, A.
    Franze, A.
    Kouroumalis, E. A.
    Mancini, M. A.
    Paspatis, G.
    Reina-Serrano, S.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (11) : 979 - 985
  • [3] Incidence and predicting factors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A cross-sectional study
    Asgari, Alireza
    Ziamanesh, Fateme
    Aliasgari, Ali
    Sohrabpour, Amir Ali
    JGH OPEN, 2024, 8 (08):
  • [4] Cleansing efficacy and safety of bowel preparation protocol using sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate considering subjective experiences: An observational study
    Liu, Fang-Xun
    Wang, Li
    Yan, Wen-Jie
    Zou, Li-Chun
    Cao, Yue-An
    Lin, Xiang-Chun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (15) : 3586 - 3596
  • [5] Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A cross-sectional study of the Chinese population
    Luo, Li
    Liu, Yuan
    Zhang, Lingling
    Lai, Yihuan
    Li, Yansheng
    Liu, Kejia
    Gong, Houwu
    Jiang, Dapeng
    Wang, Erchuan
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [6] Comparison of Four Bowel Cleansing Agents for Colonoscopy and the Factors Affecting their Efficacy. A Prospective, Randomized Study
    Kmochova, Klara
    Grega, Tomas
    Ngo, Ondrej
    Vojtechova, Gabriela
    Majek, Ondrej
    Urbanek, Petr
    Zavoral, Miroslav
    Suchanek, Stepan
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASES, 2021, 30 (02) : 213 - 220
  • [7] Comparison of bowel-cleansing efficacy of split-dose and same-day dose bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy in patients with gastrectomy: a prospective randomized study
    Gweon, Tae-Geun
    Huh, Cheal Wung
    Ji, Jeong Seon
    Kim, Chang Hyun
    Kim, Jin-Jo
    Park, Seung-Man
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (10): : 4413 - 4421
  • [8] Bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: prospective randomized assessment of efficacy and of induced mucosal abnormality with three preparation agents
    Lawrance, I. C.
    Willert, R. P.
    Murray, K.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (05) : 412 - 418
  • [9] Mannitol for bowel preparation: Efficacy and safety results from the SATISFACTION randomised clinical trial
    Vecchi, Maurizio
    Tontini, Gian Eugenio
    Fiori, Giancarla
    Bocus, Paolo
    Carnovali, Marino
    Cesaro, Paola
    Costamagna, Guido
    Di Paolo, Dhanai
    Elli, Luca
    Fedorishina, Olga
    Hinkel, Carsten
    Jakobs, Ralf
    Kashin, Sergey
    Magnoli, Michela
    Manes, Gianpiero
    Melnikova, Ekaterina
    Orsatti, Anna
    Ponchon, Thierry
    Prada, Alberto
    Radaelli, Franco
    Sferrazza, Sandro
    Soru, Pietro
    Valats, Jean Christophe
    Veselov, Victor
    Spada, Cristiano
    Uebel, Peter
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2025, 57 (02) : 574 - 583
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution for bowel preparation in Japanese patients undergoing colonoscopy: Noninferiority-based, randomized, controlled study
    Saito, Yutaka
    Oka, Shiro
    Tamai, Naoto
    Kudo, Toyoki
    Kuniyoshi, Nobutoshi
    Shirakura, Tatsuya
    Omae, Yoshio
    Hamahata, Yukihiro
    Arai, Takehiro
    Tanaka, Shinji
    Uedo, Noriya
    Shimizu, Seiji
    Fukuzawa, Masakatsu
    Uraoka, Toshio
    Ichinose, Shiori
    Ogata, Haruhiko
    Kobayashi, Kiyonori
    Saito, Shoichi
    Tajiri, Hisao
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 33 (07) : 1131 - 1138