Evaluation of an intervention to reduce musculoskeletal hazards among fresh market vegetable growers

被引:29
作者
Chapman, LJ
Newenhouse, AC
Meyer, RH
Taveira, AD
Karsh, BT
Ehlers, JJ
Palermo, T
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Occupat & Environm Safety & Hlth Dept, Whitewater, WI 53190 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ind Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH 45226 USA
[5] NIOSH, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA
关键词
agriculture; intervention evaluation; occupational health; safety;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2003.05.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Objectives: We conducted an intervention to convince small, fresh market vegetable operations to adopt mesh bags and standard containers, two production practices that aid in crop handling and that are known to improve labor efficiency and reduce exposures to musculoskeletal injury hazards. Methods: The intervention disseminated information about the practices to growers through trade publications, public events, university Extension, and growers already using the practices. A mail questionnaire was administered to vegetable growers (n = 243 and 207) before and after the intervention. Strawberry growers were used as a comparison group and also received questionnaires (n = 50 and 35). Results: After the intervention, more vegetable growers reported seeing information about mesh bags in trade publications (37% vs. 59%) and information about standard containers at public events (33% vs. 49%). Levels of self-reported adoption increased for containers (38% vs. 54%) and approached significance for bags (8% vs. 17%). Aware, non-adopting grower perceptions of bag profitability improved (2.6 vs. 3.8). Strawberry grower control results were unchanged. Conclusions: Better information flow to growers may be able to increase the speed with which agricultural practices with better ergonomics are adopted, especially when the practices are more profitable. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 66
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
ALHEARN M, 1998, US AGR INFORMATION B, V740
[2]  
Babbie E., 1990, Survey research methods, V2nd
[3]  
Cavaletto R, 1994, ASAE SUMM M KANS CIT, P19
[4]  
Contant C. K., 1997, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, V12, P20, DOI 10.1017/S0889189300007153
[5]  
Dillman D.A., 1978, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE
[6]   THE DESIGN AND ADMINISTRATION OF MAIL SURVEYS [J].
DILLMAN, DA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1991, 17 :225-249
[7]   THE ADOPTION OF AGRICULTURAL INNOVATIONS - A REVIEW [J].
FEDER, G ;
UMALI, DL .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1993, 43 (3-4) :215-239
[8]  
Fernandez-Cornejo J., 1998, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, V13, P69, DOI 10.1017/S0889189300007694
[9]  
Fett J, 1990, AGR COMM ED ANN CONV
[10]  
FLIEGEL FC, 1993, DIFFUSIOIN RES RURAL