Advanced (>second) line chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

被引:35
作者
Bruchim, Ilan [1 ]
Jarchowsky-Dolberg, Osnat [1 ]
Fishman, Ami [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Meir Med Ctr,Kfar Saba Isra, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Advanced line chemotherapy; Epithelial ovarian cancer; Ovarian cancer; Primary peritoneal carcinoma; Recurrence; PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUBICIN; PLATINUM-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; 3RD-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY; PERITONEAL CARCINOMA; RESISTANT OVARIAN; PLUS CARBOPLATIN; FALLOPIAN-TUBE; PACLITAXEL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore the pattern of chemotherapy (beyond the second-line) used to treat patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (including primary peritoneal carcinoma). Study design: This retrospective study included 156 patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal carcinoma who were treated in the Gynecologic Oncologic Department at Meir Medical Center between November 1995 and December 2003. Clinical characteristics and data regarding the surgery, chemotherapy, and response to treatment were abstracted from the patients' medical records to determine patient response to advanced lines of chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Results: Of the 156 patients, 63(40%) were treated beyond second-line chemotherapy. Clinical response to third-line chemotherapy was 11.9% (6.8% had complete clinical response and 5.1% partial clinical response) and 3.4% had stable disease. A total of 17% did not show immediate progression, with a median progression free-interval of 1.5 months. A drastic decline in clinical response rates was shown beyond third-line chemotherapy. Any response to treatment in more advanced lines was consistently under 5%. Conclusion: These results imply that advanced lines of chemotherapy are associated with low response rates, although a small percentage of patients showed some clinical response or remained with stable disease at the end of treatment. Along with patient preferences, the advantages and disadvantages of continued therapy should be considered, for the side effects of each treatment cannot be overlooked. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 98
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Randomized trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus carboplatin versus carboplatin in platinum-sensitive (PS) patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma after failure of initial platinum-based chemotherapy (Southwest Oncology Group Protocol S0200) [J].
Alberts, David S. ;
Liu, P. Y. ;
Wilczynski, Sharon P. ;
Clouser, Mary C. ;
Lopez, Ana Maria ;
Michelin, David P. ;
Lanzotti, Victor J. ;
Markman, Maurie .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 108 (01) :90-94
[2]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer [J].
Armstrong, DK ;
Bundy, B ;
Wenzel, L ;
Huang, HQ ;
Baergen, R ;
Lele, S ;
Copeland, LJ ;
Walker, JL ;
Burger, RA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (01) :34-43
[3]   Response and toxicity to topotecan in sensitive ovarian cancer cases with small residual disease after first-line treatment with carboplatinum and paclitaxel [J].
Bolis, G ;
Scarfone, G ;
Tateo, S ;
Mangili, G ;
Villa, A ;
Parazzini, F .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 80 (01) :13-15
[4]   Is there a "best" choice of second-line agent in the treatment of recurrent, potentially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer? [J].
Cannistra, SA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) :1158-1160
[5]   Cancer of the ovary [J].
Cannistra, SA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (24) :2519-2529
[6]   Screening for Ovarian Cancer [J].
Clarke-Pearson, Daniel L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (02) :170-177
[7]   Systematic review of first-line chemotherapy for newly diagnosed postoperative patients with stage II, III, or IV epithelial ovarian cancer [J].
Covens, A ;
Carey, M ;
Bryson, P ;
Verma, S ;
Fung, MFK ;
Johnston, M .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2002, 85 (01) :71-80
[8]   Treatment preferences in recurrent ovarian cancer [J].
Donovan, KA ;
Greene, PG ;
Shuster, JL ;
Partridge, EE ;
Tucker, DC .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2002, 86 (02) :200-211
[9]   2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004) [J].
du Bois, A ;
Quinn, M ;
Thigpen, T ;
Vermorken, J ;
Avall-Lundqvist, E ;
Bookman, M ;
Bowtell, D ;
Brady, M ;
Casado, A ;
Cervantes, A ;
Eisenhauer, E ;
Friedlaender, M ;
Fujiwara, K ;
Grenman, S ;
Guastalla, JP ;
Harper, P ;
Hogberg, T ;
Kaye, S ;
Kitchener, H ;
Kristensen, G ;
Mannel, R ;
Meier, W ;
Miller, B ;
Neijt, JP ;
Oza, A ;
Ozols, R ;
Parmar, M ;
Pecorelli, S ;
Pfisterer, J ;
Poveda, A ;
Provencher, D ;
Pujade-Lauraine, E ;
Randall, M ;
Rochon, J ;
Rustin, G ;
Sagae, S ;
Stehman, F ;
Stuart, G ;
Trimble, E ;
Vasey, P ;
Vergote, I ;
Verheijen, R ;
Wagner, U .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 :7-12
[10]   Long-term survival advantage for women treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared with topotecan in a phase 3 randomized study of recurrent and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer [J].
Gordon, AN ;
Tonda, M ;
Sun, S ;
Rackoff, W .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 95 (01) :1-8