Gestational weight gain and risks for adverse perinatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study based on the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines

被引:37
|
作者
Hung, Tai-Ho [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Szu-Fu [3 ]
Hsu, Jenn-Jeih [1 ]
Hsieh, T'sang-T'ang [1 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei 105, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Chinese Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Cheng Hsin Rehabil Med Ctr, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY | 2015年 / 54卷 / 04期
关键词
Institute of Medicine; large for gestational age; pregnancy outcomes; small for gestational age; weight gain; PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; PREECLAMPSIA; WOMEN; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.tjog.2015.06.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate perinatal outcomes according to the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among all term, singleton, live births to women who delivered at the Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan between 2009 and 2014. Women were categorized into three groups based on prepregnancy body mass index and GWG relative to the IOM guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the associations between GWG outside the IOM guidelines and adverse perinatal outcomes. Women with GWG within the guidelines served as the reference group. Results: Of 9301 pregnancies, 2574 (27.7%), 4189 (45.0%), and 2538 (27.3%) women had GWG below, within, and above the IOM guidelines. Women with GWG above the IOM guidelines were at risk for preeclampsia [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.0, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.9-4.71, primary cesarean delivery (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6) due to dysfunctional labor and cephalopelvic disproportion, large-for-gestational age (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.1), and macrosomic neonates (adjusted OR 2.2, 95% Cl 1.6-3.1). Women with GWG below the IOM guidelines were more likely to be diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% Cl 13-1.8) and were at higher risk for placental abruption (adjusted OR 1.7, 95% Cl 1.1-2.5), small-for-gestational age (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% Cl 1.4-1.9), and low birth weight neonates (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% Cl 1.4-2.4). Conclusion: Women with GWG outside the 2009 IOM guidelines were at risk for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Copyright (C) 2015, Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 425
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Gestational Weight Gain and Perinatal Outcomes in Adolescent Mothers: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    MacSween, Kayla
    Whelan, Emily
    Woolcott, Christy G.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2016, 38 (04) : 338 - 345
  • [12] Association between gestational weight gain and perinatal outcomes among twin gestations based on the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines: a systematic review
    Lin, Dongxin
    Huang, Zheng
    Fan, Dazhi
    Chen, Gengdong
    Ye, Shaoxin
    Wu, Shuzhen
    Guo, Xiaoling
    Luo, Caihong
    Liu, Zhengping
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 6527 - 6541
  • [13] Gestational weight gain according to the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines in patients with gestational diabetes
    Lucovnik, Miha
    Blickstein, Isaac
    Steblovnik, Lili
    Verdenik, Ivan
    Bregar, Andreja Trojner
    Tul, Natasa
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S195 - S195
  • [14] Is Adherence to the Provisional Institute of Medicine Guidelines of Weight Gain Associated With Better Perinatal Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Twin Pregnancies in Southwest China
    Yan, Jie
    Tang, Li
    Xu, Min
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 34 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [15] Evaluation of the institute of medicine guidelines for gestational weight gain
    Saade, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S93 - S94
  • [16] Gestational weight gain in twins: are the Institute of Medicine guidelines optimal for pregnancy outcomes?
    Lal, Ann
    Kim, Hajwa
    Kominiarek, Michelle
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S284 - S285
  • [17] The Institute of Medicine Guidelines for Gestational Weight Gain after a Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy Outcomes
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tita, Alan
    Biggio, Joseph R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 32 (03) : 239 - 245
  • [18] Institute of Medicine Recommendations on the Rate of Gestational Weight Gain and Perinatal Outcomes in Rural Bangladesh
    Hasan, S. M. Tafsir
    Khan, Md Alfazal
    Ahmed, Tahmeed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (12)
  • [19] The relative importance of gestational weight gain and pre-gestational diabetes on perinatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
    Wong, Karen
    Gill, Stephanie
    Murphy, Phil
    Crane, Joan
    DIABETES EPIDEMIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 8
  • [20] Pregnancy Outcomes With Weight Gain Above or Below the 2009 Institute of Medicine Guidelines
    Vlachadis, Nikolaos
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (03): : 696 - 697