Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection

被引:228
作者
Rutjens, Bastiaan T. [1 ]
Sutton, Robbie M. [2 ]
van der Lee, Romy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Kent, Canterbury, Kent, England
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
science; religion; conservatism; morality; science skepticism; anti-science; MOTIVATED REJECTION; RELIGION; LIBERALS; GOD; OPPOSITION; EDUCATION; LITERACY; BELIEFS; TRUST;
D O I
10.1177/0146167217741314
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Many topics that scientists investigate speak to people's ideological worldviews. We report three studiesincluding an analysis of large-scale survey datain which we systematically investigate the ideological antecedents of general faith in science and willingness to support science, as well as of science skepticism of climate change, vaccination, and genetic modification (GM). The main predictors are religiosity and political orientation, morality, and science understanding. Overall, science understanding is associated with vaccine and GM food acceptance, but not climate change acceptance. Importantly, different ideological predictors are related to the acceptance of different scientific findings. Political conservatism best predicts climate change skepticism. Religiosity, alongside moral purity concerns, best predicts vaccination skepticism. GM food skepticism is not fueled by religious or political ideology. Finally, religious conservatives consistently display a low faith in science and an unwillingness to support science. Thus, science acceptance and rejection have different ideological roots, depending on the topic of investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 405
页数:22
相关论文
共 55 条
[11]   Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics [J].
Drummond, Caitlin ;
Fischhoff, Baruch .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (36) :9587-9592
[12]   Epistemological and Moral Conflict Between Religion and Science [J].
Evans, John H. .
JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2011, 50 (04) :707-727
[13]  
Farias M., 2013, The Oxford handbook of atheism, P468
[14]   Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety [J].
Farias, Miguel ;
Newheiser, Anna-Kaisa ;
Kahane, Guy ;
de Toledo, Zoe .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 49 (06) :1210-1213
[15]   Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics [J].
Fiske, Susan T. ;
Dupree, Cydney .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 :13593-13597
[16]   The internal structure of the Post-Critical Belief scale [J].
Fontaine, JRJ ;
Duriez, B ;
Luyten, P ;
Hutsebaut, D .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2003, 35 (03) :501-518
[17]   Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010 [J].
Gauchat, Gordon .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2012, 77 (02) :167-187
[18]  
Gould SJ, 1997, NAT HIST, V106, P16
[19]   Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations [J].
Graham, Jesse ;
Haidt, Jonathan ;
Nosek, Brian A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (05) :1029-1046
[20]  
Haidt J., 2007, Social Justice Research, V20, P98, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11211-007-0034-Z