Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection

被引:228
作者
Rutjens, Bastiaan T. [1 ]
Sutton, Robbie M. [2 ]
van der Lee, Romy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Kent, Canterbury, Kent, England
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
science; religion; conservatism; morality; science skepticism; anti-science; MOTIVATED REJECTION; RELIGION; LIBERALS; GOD; OPPOSITION; EDUCATION; LITERACY; BELIEFS; TRUST;
D O I
10.1177/0146167217741314
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Many topics that scientists investigate speak to people's ideological worldviews. We report three studiesincluding an analysis of large-scale survey datain which we systematically investigate the ideological antecedents of general faith in science and willingness to support science, as well as of science skepticism of climate change, vaccination, and genetic modification (GM). The main predictors are religiosity and political orientation, morality, and science understanding. Overall, science understanding is associated with vaccine and GM food acceptance, but not climate change acceptance. Importantly, different ideological predictors are related to the acceptance of different scientific findings. Political conservatism best predicts climate change skepticism. Religiosity, alongside moral purity concerns, best predicts vaccination skepticism. GM food skepticism is not fueled by religious or political ideology. Finally, religious conservatives consistently display a low faith in science and an unwillingness to support science. Thus, science acceptance and rejection have different ideological roots, depending on the topic of investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 405
页数:22
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Nature, V545, P133, DOI 10.1038/545133b
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PROCESS VERSATILE CO
[3]   Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition [J].
Blancke, Stefaan ;
Van Breusegem, Frank ;
De Jaeger, Geert ;
Braeckman, Johan ;
Van Montagu, Mare .
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2015, 20 (07) :414-418
[4]   The Implications of the Cognitive Sciences for the Relation Between Religion and Science Education: The Case of Evolutionary Theory [J].
Blancke, Stefaan ;
De Smedt, Johan ;
De Cruz, Helen ;
Boudry, Maarten ;
Braeckman, Johan .
SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2012, 21 (08) :1167-1184
[5]   Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology [J].
Brossard, Dominique ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. ;
Kim, Eunkyung ;
Lewenstein, Bruce V. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2009, 18 (05) :546-558
[6]   Religion, Paranormal Beliefs, and Distrust in Science: Comparing East Versus West [J].
Clobert, Magali ;
Saroglou, Vassilis .
ARCHIVE FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION-ARCHIV FUR RELIGIONSPSYCHOLOGIE, 2015, 37 (02) :185-199
[7]   Explanatory Judgment, Moral Offense and Value-Free Science [J].
Colombo M. ;
Bucher L. ;
Inbar Y. .
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2016, 7 (4) :743-763
[8]  
Dawkins R., 2006, GOD DELUSION
[9]   Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond [J].
Diethelm, Pascal ;
McKee, Martin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 19 (01) :2-4
[10]   Climate change: Why the conspiracy theories are dangerous [J].
Douglas, Karen M. ;
Sutton, Robbie M. .
BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 2015, 71 (02) :98-106