Mapping between headache specific and generic preference-based health-related quality of life measures

被引:2
|
作者
Khan, Kamran [1 ,2 ]
Mistry, Hema [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Matharu, Manjit [4 ,5 ]
Norman, Chloe [1 ]
Petrou, Stavros [1 ,6 ]
Stewart, Kimberley [1 ]
Underwood, Martin [1 ,3 ]
Achana, Felix [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Ctr Hlth Econ, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry CV2 2DX, W Midlands, England
[4] Inst Neurol, Headache Grp, Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[5] Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[6] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
关键词
Headache; Migraine; Quality of Life; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; ACUPUNCTURE; EQ-5D-3L;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-022-01762-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and the Chronic Headache Questionnaire (CH-QLQ) measure headache-related quality of life but are not preference-based and therefore cannot be used to generate health utilities for cost-effectiveness analyses. There are currently no established algorithms for mapping between the HIT-6 or CH-QLQ and preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures for chronic headache population. Methods We developed algorithms for generating EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D utilities from the HIT-6 and the CHQLQ using both direct and response mapping approaches. A multi-stage model selection process was used to assess the predictive accuracy of the models. The estimated mapping algorithms were derived to generate UK tariffs and was validated using the Chronic Headache Education and Self-management Study (CHESS) trial dataset. Results Several models were developed that reasonably accurately predict health utilities in this context. The best performing model for predicting EQ-5D-5L utility scores from the HIT-6 scores was a Censored Least Absolute Deviations (CLAD) (1) model that only included the HIT-6 score as the covariate (mean squared error (MSE) 0.0550). The selected model for CH-QLQ to EQ-5D-5L was the CLAD (3) model that included CH-QLQ summary scores, age, and gender, squared terms and interaction terms as covariates (MSE 0.0583). The best performing model for predicting SF-6D utility scores from the HIT-6 scores was the CLAD (2) model that included the HIT-6 score and age and gender as covariates (MSE 0.0102). The selected model for CH-QLQ to SF-6D was the OLS (2) model that included CH-QLQ summary scores, age, and gender as covariates (MSE 0.0086). Conclusion The developed algorithms enable the estimation of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D utilities from two headache-specific questionnaires where preference-based health-related quality of life data are missing. However, further work is needed to help define the best approach to measuring health utilities in headache studies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Working With Children to Develop Dimensions for a Preference-Based, Generic, Pediatric, Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measure
    Stevens, Katherine J.
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2010, 20 (03) : 340 - 351
  • [22] Relationship Between the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) and Preference-Based/Health Utility Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Kidney Stone Patients
    Polotti, Charles
    Tan, Bryan
    Borglum, Nicole
    Olweny, Ephrem O.
    UROLOGY, 2020, 141 : 33 - 38
  • [23] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE WISCONSIN STONE QUALITY OF LIFE (WISQOL) AND PREFERENCE-BASED / HEALTH UTILITY MEASURES OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (HRQOL) IN KIDNEY STONE PATIENTS
    Polotti, Charles
    Tan, Bryan
    Borglum, Nicole
    Olweny, Ephrem
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E1113 - E1113
  • [24] Preference-based Glaucoma-specific Health-related Quality of Life Instrument: Development of the Health Utility for Glaucoma
    Muratov, Sergei
    Podbielski, Dominik W.
    Kennedy, Kevin
    Jack, Susan M.
    Pemberton, Julia
    Ahmed, Iqbal I. K.
    Baltaziak, Monika
    Xie, Feng
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2018, 27 (07) : 585 - 591
  • [25] PREFERENCE-BASED HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE FOR HEART DISEASE PATIENTS IN JAPAN
    Noto, S.
    Fukuda, T.
    Saito, S.
    Shimozuma, K.
    Ikeda, S.
    Shiroiwa, T.
    Igarashi, A.
    Ishida, H.
    Moriwaki, K.
    Kobayashi, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S31 - S31
  • [26] A PREFERENCE-BASED APPROACH TO HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER
    BARR, RD
    FEENY, D
    FURLONG, W
    WEITZMAN, S
    TORRANCE, GW
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY, 1995, 2 (04): : 305 - 315
  • [27] Refining items for a preference-based, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis specific, health-related quality of life scale
    Van Damme, Jill
    Kuspinar, Ayse
    Johnston, Wendy
    O'Connell, Colleen
    Turnbull, John
    Chum, Marvin
    Strachan, Patricia
    Luth, Westerly
    McCullum, Shane
    Peters, Nicole
    MacDermid, Joy
    Dal Bello-Haas, Vanina
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION, 2022, 23 (7-8) : 508 - 516
  • [28] Preference-based health-related quality of life in the context of aphasia: a research synthesis
    Whitehurst, David G. T.
    Latimer, Nicholas R.
    Kagan, Aura
    Palmer, Rebecca
    Simmons-Mackie, Nina
    Hoch, Jeffrey S.
    APHASIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (07) : 763 - 780
  • [29] Race Differences in Preference-based Health-related Quality of Life in the United States
    Pereira, Claudia C.
    Palta, Mari
    Mullahy, John
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 104 - 104
  • [30] HOW DO DIFFERENT HEALTH CONDITIONS IMPACT DIMENSIONS OF PEDIATRIC PREFERENCE-BASED HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE MEASURES?
    Xiong, X.
    Dalziel, K.
    Huang, L.
    Mulhern, B.
    Carvalho, N.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S104 - S104