Mapping between headache specific and generic preference-based health-related quality of life measures

被引:2
|
作者
Khan, Kamran [1 ,2 ]
Mistry, Hema [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Matharu, Manjit [4 ,5 ]
Norman, Chloe [1 ]
Petrou, Stavros [1 ,6 ]
Stewart, Kimberley [1 ]
Underwood, Martin [1 ,3 ]
Achana, Felix [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Ctr Hlth Econ, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry CV2 2DX, W Midlands, England
[4] Inst Neurol, Headache Grp, Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[5] Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[6] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
关键词
Headache; Migraine; Quality of Life; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; ACUPUNCTURE; EQ-5D-3L;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-022-01762-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and the Chronic Headache Questionnaire (CH-QLQ) measure headache-related quality of life but are not preference-based and therefore cannot be used to generate health utilities for cost-effectiveness analyses. There are currently no established algorithms for mapping between the HIT-6 or CH-QLQ and preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures for chronic headache population. Methods We developed algorithms for generating EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D utilities from the HIT-6 and the CHQLQ using both direct and response mapping approaches. A multi-stage model selection process was used to assess the predictive accuracy of the models. The estimated mapping algorithms were derived to generate UK tariffs and was validated using the Chronic Headache Education and Self-management Study (CHESS) trial dataset. Results Several models were developed that reasonably accurately predict health utilities in this context. The best performing model for predicting EQ-5D-5L utility scores from the HIT-6 scores was a Censored Least Absolute Deviations (CLAD) (1) model that only included the HIT-6 score as the covariate (mean squared error (MSE) 0.0550). The selected model for CH-QLQ to EQ-5D-5L was the CLAD (3) model that included CH-QLQ summary scores, age, and gender, squared terms and interaction terms as covariates (MSE 0.0583). The best performing model for predicting SF-6D utility scores from the HIT-6 scores was the CLAD (2) model that included the HIT-6 score and age and gender as covariates (MSE 0.0102). The selected model for CH-QLQ to SF-6D was the OLS (2) model that included CH-QLQ summary scores, age, and gender as covariates (MSE 0.0086). Conclusion The developed algorithms enable the estimation of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D utilities from two headache-specific questionnaires where preference-based health-related quality of life data are missing. However, further work is needed to help define the best approach to measuring health utilities in headache studies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping between headache specific and generic preference-based health-related quality of life measures
    Kamran Khan
    Hema Mistry
    Manjit Matharu
    Chloe Norman
    Stavros Petrou
    Kimberley Stewart
    Martin Underwood
    Felix Achana
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22
  • [2] A Review of Generic Preference-Based Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life in Visual Disorders
    Tosh, Jonathan
    Brazier, John
    Evans, Philippa
    Longworth, Louise
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (01) : 118 - 127
  • [3] Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life
    Lenert, L
    Kaplan, RM
    MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (09) : 138 - 150
  • [4] Challenges in the validation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life
    Nease, RF
    MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (09) : 155 - 159
  • [5] Race and preference-based health-related quality of life measures in the United States
    Claudia C. A. Pereira
    Mari Palta
    John Mullahy
    Dennis G. Fryback
    Quality of Life Research, 2011, 20 : 969 - 978
  • [6] Race and preference-based health-related quality of life measures in the United States
    Pereira, Claudia C. A.
    Palta, Mari
    Mullahy, John
    Fryback, Dennis G.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (06) : 969 - 978
  • [7] Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in Indigenous people: a systematic review
    Roy, Lilla M.
    Neill, Aidan
    Swampy, Kristen
    Auger, Juliette
    Campbell, Sandra M.
    Chatwood, Susan
    Al Sayah, Fatima
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (02) : 317 - 333
  • [8] Responsiveness of proxy-rated preference-based measures of health-related quality of life
    Wilke, C. T.
    Pickard, A. S.
    Feeny, D. H.
    Johnson, J. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : A206 - A206
  • [9] Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in Indigenous people: a systematic review
    Lilla M. Roy
    Aidan Neill
    Kristen Swampy
    Juliette Auger
    Sandra M. Campbell
    Susan Chatwood
    Fatima Al Sayah
    Jeffrey A. Johnson
    Quality of Life Research, 2024, 33 : 317 - 333
  • [10] An Updated Systematic Review of Studies Mapping (or Cross-Walking) Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life to Generic Preference-Based Measures to Generate Utility Values
    Clara Mukuria
    Donna Rowen
    Sue Harnan
    Andrew Rawdin
    Ruth Wong
    Roberta Ara
    John Brazier
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2019, 17 : 295 - 313