Internet and Social Media For Health-Related Information and Communication in Health Care: Preferences of the Dutch General Population

被引:95
作者
Van de Belt, Tom H. [1 ]
Engelen, Lucien J. L. P. G. [1 ]
Berben, Sivera A. A. [2 ]
Teerenstra, Steven [3 ]
Samsom, Melvin [4 ]
Schoonhoven, Lisette [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud REshape & Innovat Ctr, NL-6525 GC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Reg Emergency Healthcare Network, NL-6525 GC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Evidence, Sect Biostat, NL-6525 GC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Execut Board, NL-6525 GC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Sci Inst Qual Healthcare, NL-6525 GC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Southampton, Fac Hlth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
social media; patient participation; consumer health information; empowerment; Health; 2.0; NETWORKING; WEBSITES;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.2607
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health care is increasingly featured by the use of Web 2.0 communication and collaborative technologies that are reshaping the way patients and professionals interact. These technologies or tools can be used for a variety of purposes: to instantly debate issues, discover news, analyze research, network with peers, crowd-source information, seek support, and provide advice. Not all tools are implemented successfully; in many cases, the nonusage attrition rates are high. Little is known about the preferences of the Dutch general population regarding the use of the Internet and social media in health care. Objective: To determine the preferences of the general population in the Netherlands regarding the use of the Internet and social media in health care. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was disseminated via a popular Dutch online social network. Respondents were asked where they searched for health-related information, how they qualified the value of different sources, and their preferences regarding online communication with health care providers. Results were weighed for the Dutch population based on gender, age, and level of education using official statistics. Numbers and percentages or means and standard deviations were presented for different subgroups. One-way ANOVA was used to test for statistical differences. Results: The survey was completed by 635 respondents. The Internet was found to be the number one source for health-related information (82.7%), closely followed by information provided by health care professionals (71.1%). Approximately one-third (32.3%) of the Dutch population search for ratings of health care providers. The most popular information topics were side effects of medication (62.5%) and symptoms (59.7%). Approximately one-quarter of the Dutch population prefer to communicate with a health care provider via social media (25.4%), and 21.2% would like to communicate via a webcam. Conclusions: The Internet is the main source of health-related information for the Dutch population. One in 4 persons wants to communicate with their physician via social media channels and it is expected that this number will further increase. Health care providers should explore new ways of communicating online and should facilitate ways for patients to connect with them. Future research should aim at comparing different patient groups and diseases, describing best practices, and determining cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 162
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   Associations between internet-based patient ratings and conventional surveys of patient experience in the English NHS: an observational study [J].
Greaves, Felix ;
Pape, Utz J. ;
King, Dominic ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Majeed, Azeem ;
Wachter, Robert M. ;
Millett, Christopher .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2012, 21 (07) :600-605
[12]   ACCESSING INFORMATION ON IBD: A SURVEY OF SOURCES AND RELIABILITY OF INTERNET RESOURCES [J].
Greaves, R. A. Ley ;
Wilkinson, L. F. ;
Orchard, T. .
GUT, 2012, 61 :A396-A396
[13]  
Grol R., 2005, Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice
[14]   Social Networking in the National Health Service in England: A Quantitative Analysis of the Online Identities of 152 Primary Care Trusts [J].
Hawker, Mark D. .
MEDINFO 2010, PTS I AND II, 2010, 160 :356-360
[16]  
Internet World Stats, 2012, EUR INT US
[17]   Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media [J].
Kaplan, Andreas M. ;
Haenlein, Michael .
BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2010, 53 (01) :59-68
[18]   #ClinMed: What have social media got to do with medicine? [J].
McCracken, Andrew .
CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2012, 12 (04) :310-311
[19]  
Moretti FA, 2012, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V58, P650
[20]   Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study [J].
Murray, Elizabeth ;
Burns, Joanne ;
May, Carl ;
Finch, Tracy ;
O'Donnell, Catherine ;
Wallace, Paul ;
Mair, Frances .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2011, 6