Internet and Social Media For Health-Related Information and Communication in Health Care: Preferences of the Dutch General Population

被引:95
作者
Van de Belt, Tom H. [1 ]
Engelen, Lucien J. L. P. G. [1 ]
Berben, Sivera A. A. [2 ]
Teerenstra, Steven [3 ]
Samsom, Melvin [4 ]
Schoonhoven, Lisette [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud REshape & Innovat Ctr, NL-6525 GC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Reg Emergency Healthcare Network, NL-6525 GC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Evidence, Sect Biostat, NL-6525 GC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Execut Board, NL-6525 GC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Sci Inst Qual Healthcare, NL-6525 GC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Southampton, Fac Hlth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
social media; patient participation; consumer health information; empowerment; Health; 2.0; NETWORKING; WEBSITES;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.2607
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health care is increasingly featured by the use of Web 2.0 communication and collaborative technologies that are reshaping the way patients and professionals interact. These technologies or tools can be used for a variety of purposes: to instantly debate issues, discover news, analyze research, network with peers, crowd-source information, seek support, and provide advice. Not all tools are implemented successfully; in many cases, the nonusage attrition rates are high. Little is known about the preferences of the Dutch general population regarding the use of the Internet and social media in health care. Objective: To determine the preferences of the general population in the Netherlands regarding the use of the Internet and social media in health care. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was disseminated via a popular Dutch online social network. Respondents were asked where they searched for health-related information, how they qualified the value of different sources, and their preferences regarding online communication with health care providers. Results were weighed for the Dutch population based on gender, age, and level of education using official statistics. Numbers and percentages or means and standard deviations were presented for different subgroups. One-way ANOVA was used to test for statistical differences. Results: The survey was completed by 635 respondents. The Internet was found to be the number one source for health-related information (82.7%), closely followed by information provided by health care professionals (71.1%). Approximately one-third (32.3%) of the Dutch population search for ratings of health care providers. The most popular information topics were side effects of medication (62.5%) and symptoms (59.7%). Approximately one-quarter of the Dutch population prefer to communicate with a health care provider via social media (25.4%), and 21.2% would like to communicate via a webcam. Conclusions: The Internet is the main source of health-related information for the Dutch population. One in 4 persons wants to communicate with their physician via social media channels and it is expected that this number will further increase. Health care providers should explore new ways of communicating online and should facilitate ways for patients to connect with them. Future research should aim at comparing different patient groups and diseases, describing best practices, and determining cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 162
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Internet use by the public to search for health-related information [J].
AlGhamdi, Khalid M. ;
Moussa, Noura A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2012, 81 (06) :363-373
[2]   Social Media, Text Messaging, and Email-Preferences of Asthma Patients between 12 and 40 Years Old [J].
Baptist, Alan P. ;
Thompson, Michael ;
Grossman, Karla Stoermer ;
Mohammed, Layla ;
Sy, Annie ;
Sanders, Georgiana M. .
JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2011, 48 (08) :824-830
[3]  
Bartholomew L., 2011, Planning Health Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach, V3rd
[4]   How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX [J].
Boulos, Maged N. Kamel ;
Wheeler, Steve ;
Tavares, Carlos ;
Jones, Ray .
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2011, 10
[5]   How technology is empowering patients? A literature review [J].
Calvillo, Jorge ;
Roman, Isabel ;
Roa, Laura M. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (05) :643-652
[6]   Stages of use: consideration, initiation, utilization, and outcomes of an internet-mediated intervention [J].
Chiu, Teresa M. L. ;
Eysenbach, Gunther .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2010, 10
[7]   Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review [J].
Emmert, Martin ;
Sander, Uwe ;
Pisch, Frank .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (02) :e24
[8]   The Law of Attrition [J].
Eysenbach, G .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (01)
[9]   Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness [J].
Eysenbach, Gunther .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (03)
[10]  
Fox S., 2013, HLTH ONLINE 2013