Consensus Guidelines for Facilities Performing Outpatient Procedures Evidence Over Ideology

被引:8
作者
Levy, Barbara S.
Ness, Debra L.
Weinberger, Steven E.
机构
[1] Amer Coll Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 409 12th St SW, Washington, DC 20024 USA
[2] Natl Partnership Women & Families, Washington, DC USA
[3] Amer Coll Physicians, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000003058
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In policy and law, regulation of abortion is frequently treated differently from other health services. The safety of abortion is similar to that of other types of office- and clinic-based procedures, and facility requirements should be based on assuring high-quality, safe performance of all such procedures. False concerns for patient safety are being used as a justification for promoting regulations that specifically target abortion. The Project on Facility Guidelines for the Safe Performance of Primary Care and Gynecology Procedures in Offices and Clinics was undertaken by clinicians, consumers, and representatives from accrediting bodies to review the available evidence and guidelines that inform safe delivery of outpatient care. Our overall objective was to develop evidence-informed consensus guidelines to promote health care quality, safety, and accessibility. Our consensus determined that requiring facilities performing office-based procedures, including abortion, to meet standards beyond those currently in effect for all general medical offices and clinics is unjustified based on an analysis of available evidence. No safety concerns were identified.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 260
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, DEF PROC REL OBST GY
[2]   The effect of facility characteristics on patient safety, patient experience, and service availability for procedures in non-hospital-affiliated outpatient settings: A systematic [J].
Berglas, Nancy F. ;
Battistelli, Molly F. ;
Nicholson, Wanda K. ;
Sobota, Mindy ;
Urman, Richard D. ;
Roberts, Sarah C. M. .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01)
[3]   AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care [J].
Brouwers, Melissa C. ;
Kho, Michelle E. ;
Browman, George P. ;
Burgers, Jako S. ;
Cluzeau, Francoise ;
Feder, Gene ;
Fervers, Beatrice ;
Graham, Ian D. ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy ;
Hanna, Steven E. ;
Littlejohns, Peter ;
Makarski, Julie ;
Zitzelsberger, Louise .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (18) :E839-E842
[4]   The Safety and Quality of Abortion Services in the United States: What Does the Evidence Indicate? [J].
Calonge, Bruce N. ;
Gayle, Helene D. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 168 (12) :878-+
[5]  
Guttmacher Institute, STAT FACTS AB
[6]  
National Academies of Sciences E. and Medicine, 2018, SAF QUAL AB CAR UN S
[7]   Introducing AORN's New Model for Evidence Rating [J].
Spruce, Lisa ;
Van Wicklin, Sharon A. ;
Hicks, Rodney W. ;
Conner, Ramona ;
Dunn, Debra .
AORN JOURNAL, 2014, 99 (02) :243-255
[8]   Legislative Interference with the Patient-Physician Relationship [J].
Weinberger, Steven E. ;
Lawrence, Hal C., III ;
Henley, Douglas E. ;
Alden, Errol R. ;
Hoyt, David B. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (16) :1557-1559