A voice in the skies: Listening to airline passenger preferences

被引:29
|
作者
Kurtulmusoglu, Feride Bahar [1 ]
Can, Gulin Feryal [2 ]
Tolon, Metehan [3 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Baskent Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Dept Business Adm, Sch Econ & Adm Sci, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Airline service expectation; SMAA-2; Voice of customer; LOW-COST AIRLINES; SERVICE QUALITY; BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; FUZZY APPROACH; PERCEPTIONS; CARRIERS; EXPECTATIONS; BUSINESS; LOYALTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.07.017
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This study aims to identify the impact levels and priorities in the service expectations that passengers 'have when identifying a preferred airline. The results are based on probabilities and impacts, and can help airlines to accurately understand the preference criteria of their passengers. The priorities of the passengers may differ according to the airline chosen; therefore, the probabilities shown in this study can inform senior airline managers about the passenger perspective. This study uses the Stochastic Multi criteria Acceptability Analysis-2 (SMAA-2) method. SMAA-2 identifies the priorities and impact levels of passengers' expectations on airline selection, and the ranking of alternative firms according to the probability. According to the obtained results, Airline 3 (AF(3)) is the most preferred airline with the highest confidence rate. This airline operates based on a low-cost model that allows passengers to choose additional services for additional charges. The passenger expectations that have the highest impact on the preference when selecting an airline are 1) ticket prices, 2) punctuality, and 3) booking convenience. Free in-flight food and beverages, the variety and quality of the food and beverages, and voyager miles programs for loyal customers are found to have no impact on the ranking of airlines. The expectations identified by the passengers in this study are related to the outcome quality dimension, with services dominated by flexible features. The findings of this study define the passenger as a rational decision maker who is price sensitive. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 137
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring passenger preferences in airline service attributes: A note
    Chen, Ching-Fu
    Wu, Tsai-Fang
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2009, 15 (01) : 52 - 53
  • [2] LISTENING PREFERENCES FOR VOICE TYPES AS A FUNCTION OF AGE
    HOLLIEN, H
    GELFER, MP
    CARLSON, T
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 1991, 24 (02) : 157 - 171
  • [3] Stated preference as a tool to evaluate airline passenger preferences and priorities
    Whitaker, B
    Terzis, G
    Soong, E
    Yeh, W
    AIRPORTS, AIRSPACE, AND PASSENGER MANAGEMENT, 2005, (1915): : 55 - 61
  • [4] Flying the not-so-friendly skies: airline passenger misconduct, 1999-2020
    Skaggs, Sheryl
    Vieraitis, Lynne M. M.
    DEVIANT BEHAVIOR, 2023, 44 (12) : 1792 - 1805
  • [5] Voice of airline passenger: A text mining approach to understand customer satisfaction
    Sezgen, Eren
    Mason, Keith J.
    Mayer, Robert
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 77 : 65 - 74
  • [6] FRIENDLY SKIES FOR AIRLINE STOCKHOLDERS
    SERWER, AE
    FORTUNE, 1988, 118 (14) : 40 - 40
  • [7] THE AIRLINE ORPHANS - REFLECTIONS ON THE FRIENDLY SKIES
    DAVISSON, B
    AIR PROGRESS, 1984, 46 (04): : 31 - 31
  • [8] Investigating users' preferences and expectations for always-listening voice assistants
    Tabassum M.
    Kosinski T.
    Frik A.
    Malkin N.
    Wijesekera P.
    Egelman S.
    Lipford H.R.
    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2019, 3 (04)
  • [9] Airline passenger traffic openness and the performance of Emirates Airline
    Squalli, Jay
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2014, 54 (01): : 138 - 145
  • [10] FRIENDLY SKIES OR TURBULENT SKIES: AN EVALUATION OF THE US AIRLINE INDUSTRY AND ANTITRUST CONCERNS
    Kinder, Kevin
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2018, 91 (05) : 943 - 988