Disinfection of dental impressions: knowledge and practice among dental technicians

被引:25
作者
Al Mortadi, Noor [1 ]
Al-Khatib, Aceil [2 ]
Alzoubi, Karem H. [3 ]
Khabour, Omar F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Appl Med Sci, Dept Appl Dent Sci, POB 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[2] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Med & Oral Surg, Irbid, Jordan
[3] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm, Irbid, Jordan
[4] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Appl Med Sci, Dept Med Lab Sci, Irbid, Jordan
关键词
disinfection; dental impressions; knowledge; practice; dental technicians;
D O I
10.2147/CCIDE.S205144
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Dental impressions are a common source for transmission of infection between dental clinics and dental labs. Dental impressions can be cross-contaminated by patient's saliva and blood, which then cross-infect the dental casts poured from the impressions. Objective: To evaluate the current practices of disinfection of dental impressions and their protocols and to assess the knowledge of cross-infection control among dental technicians in Jordan. Method: Dental technicians (n=85) completed a self-administered questionnaire about their practices of disinfection for dental impressions. Results: The distribution of dental technicians was 63.8% fixed prosthodontics, 23.5% removable prosthodontics, 7.8% orthodontics, and 4.8% maxillofacial prosthodontics. The majority of the laboratories did not have instructions related to disinfection of impressions. About 50% of technicians were vaccinated against HBV. About 44.7%, and 42.9% of labs reported that they never disinfect alginate or silicon impressions, respectively. In addition, the majority of lab owners (53%) believed that the dentist should disinfect the impressions before shipping them to dental laboratories, while (45%) believed that disinfecting the impressions is the responsibility of the dental assistant. Moreover, about 38% of this study population reported not using gloves in their labs. In those labs were disinfection was used, 51% used spray disinfection whereas 32.6% used immersion disinfection. The cost of disinfectant was ranked as the most important factor (51.3% of the cases) for the dental technician to choose the disinfectant followed by its effectiveness. Conclusion: Dental technician practices in impression disinfection was not satisfactory, therefore, education programs about impression disinfection are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Al-Dwairi ZN, 2007, J DENT EDUC, V71, P1223
[2]   Disinfection of dental impressions - compliance to accepted standards [J].
Almortadi, N. ;
Chadwick, R. G. .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2010, 209 (12) :607-611
[3]   A survey of the methods of disinfection of dental impressions used in dental hospitals in the United Kingdom [J].
Blair, FM ;
Wassell, RW .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1996, 180 (10) :369-375
[4]  
British Dental Association, 2013, 0105 BRIT DENT ASS D
[5]   Effectiveness of Disinfectants on Antimicrobial and Physical Properties of Dental Impression Materials [J].
Demajo, Jean Karl ;
Cassar, Valter ;
Farrugia, Cher ;
Millan-Sango, David ;
Sammut, Charles ;
Valdramidis, Vasilis ;
Camilleri, Josette .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2016, 29 (01) :63-67
[6]  
Garn RJ, 1992, DENT TECH, V45, P103
[7]  
Hemalatha R, 2016, J Pharm Sci Res, V8, P661
[8]  
Kugel G, 2000, IOURNAL AM DENT ASS, V131, P786, DOI DOI 10.14219/JADA.ARCHIVE.2000.0278
[9]  
LEPE X, 1995, J PROSTHET DENT, V74, P181
[10]   GYPSUM CASTS AS A POTENTIAL SOURCE OF MICROBIAL CROSS-CONTAMINATION [J].
LEUNG, RL ;
SCHONFELD, SE .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 49 (02) :210-211