A class of proportional win-fractions regression models for composite outcomes

被引:20
|
作者
Mao, Lu [1 ]
Wang, Tuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
Keywords; cardiovascular trials; prioritized endpoints; probabilistic index models; proportionality assumption; U-processes; win ratio; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RATIO;
D O I
10.1111/biom.13382
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The win ratio is gaining traction as a simple and intuitive approach to analysis of prioritized composite endpoints in clinical trials. To extend it from two-sample comparison to regression, we propose a novel class of semiparametric models that includes as special cases both the two-sample win ratio and the traditional Cox proportional hazards model on time to the first event. Under the assumption that the covariate-specific win and loss fractions are proportional over time, the regression coefficient is unrelated to the censoring distribution and can be interpreted as the log win ratio resulting from one-unit increase in the covariate.U-statistic estimating functions, in the form of an arbitrary covariate-specific weight process integrated by a pairwise residual process, are constructed to obtain consistent estimators for the regression parameter. The asymptotic properties of the estimators are derived using uniform weak convergence theory forU-processes. Visual inspection of a "score" process provides useful clues as to the plausibility of the proportionality assumption. Extensive numerical studies using both simulated and real data from a major cardiovascular trial show that the regression methods provide valid inference on covariate effects and outperform the two-sample win ratio in both efficiency and robustness. The proposed methodology is implemented in the R-packageWR, publicly available from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).
引用
收藏
页码:1265 / 1275
页数:11
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Stratified proportional win-fractions regression analysis
    Wang, Tuo
    Mao, Lu
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (26) : 5305 - 5318
  • [2] The win ratio approach to analyzing composite outcomes: An application to the EVOLVE trial
    Abdalla, Safa
    Montez-Rath, Maria E.
    Parfrey, Patrick S.
    Chertow, Glenn M.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 48 : 119 - 124
  • [3] Misspecification of Cox regression models with composite endpoints
    Wu, Longyang
    Cook, Richard J.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (28) : 3545 - 3562
  • [4] Hierarchical composite outcomes are here to stay, despite the limitations of the win ratio
    Davison, Beth A.
    Cotter, Gad
    Koch, Gary G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2025,
  • [5] Modeling Pregnancy Outcomes Through Sequentially Nested Regression Models
    Bi, Xuan
    Feng, Long
    Li, Cai
    Zhang, Heping
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 117 (538) : 602 - 616
  • [6] Alternatives to Logistic Regression Models when Analyzing Cluster Randomized Trials with Binary Outcomes
    Huang, Francis L.
    PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2023, 24 (03) : 398 - 407
  • [7] Marine n-3 Fatty Acids and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Novel Analysis of the VITAL Trial Using Win Ratio and Hierarchical Composite Outcomes
    Ogata, Soshiro
    Manson, JoAnn E.
    Kang, Jae H.
    Buring, Julie E.
    Lee, I-Min
    Nishimura, Kunihiro
    Sakata, Yasuhiko
    Danik, Jacqueline Suk
    D'Agostino, Denise
    Mora, Samia
    Albert, Christine M.
    Cook, Nancy R.
    NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [8] Meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes using a hazard-based approach: Comparison with other models, robustness and meta-regression
    Fiocco, Marta
    Stijnen, Theo
    Putter, Hein
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2012, 56 (05) : 1028 - 1037