Factors Associated with Recidivism among Corrections-Based Treatment Participants in Rural and Urban Areas

被引:25
作者
Staton-Tindall, Michele [1 ]
Harp, Kathi L. H. [2 ]
Winston, Erin [3 ]
Webster, J. Matthew [4 ]
Pangburn, Kevin [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Coll Social Work, Lexington, KY 40508 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Behav Sci, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Ctr Drug & Alcohol Res, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Behav Sci, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[5] Kentucky Dept Correct, Frankfort, KY 40601 USA
关键词
Corrections-based treatment; Recidivism; Rural offenders; Treatment outcomes; THERAPEUTIC-COMMUNITY TREATMENT; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MENTAL-ILLNESS; OUTCOMES; OFFENDERS; DISORDERS; PROGRAMS; SERVICES; ARREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsat.2015.03.005
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The majority of corrections-based treatment outcome studies focus on individuals paroling to urban areas; thus there is a significant gap in the literature on outcomes, including recidivism, among individuals paroling to non-urban and rural communities. This study examines differences in factors associated with recidivism among former corrections-based treatment participants living in urban and rural communities following release. Analyses focused on secondary data collected from treatment participants in one southeastern state over a four year period between July 2006 and June 2010 including both baseline (treatment intake) and follow-up data (12-months post-release). Findings indicated that individuals in urban areas were 2.4 times more likely to recidivate than rural individuals. Other factors identified in separate rural and urban analyses also emerged as significant predictors in the overall model including age, gender, race, employment and drug use. Overall, these findings suggest that corrections-based treatment participants living in urban and rural areas following release may share similar risk factors for recidivism. However, rural areas may be protective for returning to custody despite the presence of some of these risks. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Andrews D.A., 1995, LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised
  • [2] [Anonymous], PRINC DRUG AB TREATM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, STAT REC REV DOOR AM
  • [5] Psychiatric Disorders and Repeat Incarcerations: The Revolving Prison Door
    Baillargeon, Jacques
    Binswanger, Ingrid A.
    Penn, Joseph V.
    Williams, Brie A.
    Murray, Owen J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 166 (01) : 103 - 109
  • [6] Bonta J., 1996, CHOOSING CORRECTIONA, P18
  • [7] Research on rural residence and access to drug abuse services: Where are we and where do we go?
    Borders, Tyrone F.
    Booth, Brenda M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2007, 23 : 79 - 83
  • [8] Evaluating component effects of a prison-based treatment continuum
    Butzin, CA
    Martin, SS
    Inciardi, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2002, 22 (02) : 63 - 69
  • [9] Motivation for treatment in a prison-based therapeutic community
    De Leon, G
    Melnick, G
    Thomas, G
    Kressel, D
    Wexler, HK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 2000, 26 (01) : 33 - 46
  • [10] Durose M.R., 2014, BUREAU JUSTICE STAT