Open Access Awareness and Perceptions in an Institutional Landscape

被引:30
作者
Serrano-Vicente, R. [1 ]
Melero, R. [2 ]
Abadal, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, Serv Bibliotecas, Campus Univ, Pamplona 31009, Spain
[2] CSIC, Inst Agroquim & Tecnol Alimentos, Prof Escardino 7, Valencia 46980, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Fac Bibliotecon & Documentacio, Melcior de Palau 140, Barcelona 08014, Spain
关键词
Institutional repository; Open access journals; Open access; Services on top of repositories; Open access institutional policy; REPOSITORIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.acalib.2016.07.002
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the awareness of open access among the academic staff of a research oriented Spanish university, their use of the institutional repository and their satisfaction with its services. An anonymous survey of 37 questions was sent to all professors, researchers and doctoral students of the University of Navarra. A total of 352 responses (17%) were received. The responses showed statistically significant differences in opinions concerning open access journals and services created on top of the repository. Although there was general agreement on the need for open access, half the respondents adopted open access practices (which included the use of the institutional repository, and other pages and academic platforms). This percentage increased with the older respondents, who were also senior members of staff with tenure and positions of authority at the university. The decision to make publications accessible in open access depends on academic reward and on professional recognition. The services offered by the repository were generally perceived positively, with differences according to the age and subject area of the respondents. The awareness of those differences might help the university library to provide faculty with training and products that suit to their needs and habits. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 603
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J DIGITAL INFORM
[2]  
Bongiovani Paola C., 2014, Inf. cult. soc., P13
[3]  
Creaser Claire, 2010, New Review of Academic Librarianship, V16, P145, DOI 10.1080/13614533.2010.518851
[4]   The determinants of open access publishing: survey evidence from Germany [J].
Eger, Thomas ;
Scheufen, Marc ;
Meierrieks, Daniel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 39 (03) :475-503
[5]  
European Union, 2012, ONL SURV SCI INF DIG
[6]  
Frass W., 2014, OPEN ACCESS SURVEY J
[7]  
Iribarren-Maestro I, 2015, PROF INFORM, V24, P131, DOI [10.3145/epi.2015.mar.06, 10.3145/epi.2015.mar06]
[9]  
Kocken G.J., 2013, Behavioral Social Sciences Librarian, V32, P140, DOI [DOI 10.1080/01639269.2013.817876, 10.1080/01639269.2013, DOI 10.1080/01639269.2013]
[10]   Open access behaviours and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals [J].
Lwoga, Edda T. ;
Questier, Frederik .
HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 2015, 32 (01) :37-49