Assessment of Scientific Inquiry and Critical Thinking: Measuring APA Goal 2 Student Learning Outcomes

被引:7
作者
Mueller, Jon F. [1 ]
Taylor, Helen K. [2 ]
Brakke, Karen [3 ]
Drysdale, Mike [4 ]
Kelly, Kiesa [5 ]
Levine, Gary M. [6 ]
Ronquillo-Adachi, Jaclyn [7 ]
机构
[1] North Cent Coll, Dept Psychol, 30 Brainard St, Naperville, IL 60540 USA
[2] Bellevue Coll, Bellevue, WA USA
[3] Spelman Coll, Atlanta, GA 30314 USA
[4] Vincennes Univ, Vincennes, IN USA
[5] Tennessee State Univ, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[6] Edinboro Univ Penn, Edinboro, PA USA
[7] Cerritos Coll, Norwalk, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
assessment; student learning outcomes; scientific reasoning; critical thinking; information literacy; research design; INTRODUCTORY PSYCHOLOGY; PSEUDOSCIENCE; UNDERGRADUATE; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.1177/0098628320945114
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Goal 2 of theAPA Goals for Undergraduate Major in Psychology, Scientific Inquiry and Critical Thinking, addresses the development of scientific reasoning and problem-solving, including effective research methods, in undergraduate psychology students. These skills serve as the foundation of not only introductory courses but also the entire psychology curriculum. In this article, we address why these skills are critical to help students interpret information and assess claims and review the current practice of measuring student reasoning in this domain. The reach of Goal 2 is broad, including the application of scientific reasoning to interpret psychological phenomena, the demonstration of psychology information literacy, the interpretation and execution of basic psychological research, and an understanding of sociocultural influences in scientific inquiry. We discuss the value of both formative and summative assessments in this area, offer examples of assessment tools currently in use, and provide a list of nationally normed assessments in critical thinking and scientific reasoning. We conclude with a discussion of limitations in current assessment practices and suggest possible future directions.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 284
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] Citron D., 2018, DEEPFAKES NEW DISINF
  • [12] Strengthening Introductory Psychology: A New Model for Teaching the Introductory Course
    Gurung, Regan A. R.
    Hackathorn, Jana
    Enns, Carolyn
    Frantz, Susan
    Cacioppo, John T.
    Loop, Trudy
    Freeman, James E.
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 71 (02) : 112 - 124
  • [13] Haladyna T.M., 1999, Developing and validating multiple choice test items, V2nd
  • [14] Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major: Version 2.0
    Halonen, Jane S.
    Buskist, William F.
    Dunn, Dana S.
    Freeman, James E.
    Hill, G. William, IV
    Landrum, R. Eric
    McCarthy, Maureen A.
    Rudmann, Jerry L.
    Stoloff, Michael L.
    Enns, Carolyn Z.
    Kaslow, Nadine J.
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 71 (02) : 102 - 111
  • [15] Using Pseudoscience to Improve Introductory Psychology Students' Information Literacy
    Lawson, Timothy J.
    Brown, Maria
    [J]. TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 45 (03) : 220 - 225
  • [16] Lilienfeld S.O., 2010, 50 GREAT MYTHS POPUL
  • [17] RECONSTRUCTION OF AUTOMOBILE DESTRUCTION - EXAMPLE OF INTERACTION BETWEEN LANGUAGE AND MEMORY
    LOFTUS, EF
    PALMER, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1974, 13 (05): : 585 - 589
  • [18] Marek P, 2004, TEACH PSYCHOL, V31, P128
  • [19] Muehlenkamp JJ., 2015, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, V1, P125, DOI [10.1037/stl0000027, DOI 10.1037/STL0000027]
  • [20] Mueller J. F., 2019, WHAT IS AUTHENTIC AS