Has China's pilot emission trading system promoted technological progress in industrial subsectors?

被引:11
作者
Zhang, Haoran [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Yongrok [3 ]
Yang, Lingyu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xinbei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Inha Univ, Dept Intl Trade, Inharo 100, Incheon 402751, South Korea
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
emission trading system; green total factor productivity; biennial Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index; multi-period difference in differences model; mechanism test;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ac9e0c
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the 'dual carbon' goal, the key to environmental-friendly economic development is to increase total factor productivity (TFP) in a greener way. However, as a key market-based emission reduction mechanism, the exploration related to whether the emission trading system (ETS) promotes green TFP (GTFP) is not deep enough, especially for secondary decomposition of this technical index and for specific industrial subsectors. In this study, combining biennial Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index with multi-period difference in differences model, we assess the technological progress of China's pilot ETS dynamically. The results show that the pilot ETS promoted GTFP significantly in the industrial subsectors, by 8.5%. The technology change index increased by 17.5%, which is the key action path to increasing GTFP. Furtherly, the mechanism test confirms that the policy works mainly through innovation channel. This study implied that the governance toward carbon-zero economies could be accelerated much more effectively by technological innovation of green.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Low carbon growth in China: The role of emissions trading in a transitioning economy [J].
Springer, Cecilia ;
Evans, Sam ;
Lin, Jiang ;
Roland-Holst, David .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 235 :1118-1125
[12]   A dynamic and continuous allowances allocation methodology for the prevention of carbon leakage: Emission control coefficients [J].
Sun, YongPing ;
Xue, JinJun ;
Shi, XunPeng ;
Wang, KeYing ;
Qi, ShaoZhou ;
Wang, Lei ;
Wang, Cheng .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 236 :220-230
[13]   Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis? -Empirical analysis based on the PSM-DID method [J].
Wang, Han ;
Chen, Zhoupeng ;
Wu, Xingyi ;
Niea, Xin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 :930-938
[14]   Emissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story [J].
Yan, Yaxue ;
Zhang, Xiaoling ;
Zhang, Jihong ;
Li, Kai .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 138
[15]   Evaluation on the effectiveness of China's pilot carbon market policy [J].
Yi, Lan ;
Bai, Ning ;
Yang, Li ;
Li, Zhaopeng ;
Wang, Fei .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 246
[16]   Study on serviceability and efficiency of seven pilot carbon trading exchanges in China [J].
Yi, Lan ;
Liu, Yan ;
Li, Zhao-peng ;
Yang, Li ;
Wang, Fei .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 703
[17]  
Zhang H-J., 2021, CLIM CHANGE RES, V17, P579, DOI DOI 10.12006/J.ISSN.1673-1719.2020.238
[18]   China's pilot emissions trading schemes and competitiveness: An empirical analysis of the provincial industrial sub-sectors [J].
Zhang, Haijun ;
Duan, Maosheng .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 258
[19]   Have China's pilot emissions trading schemes promoted carbon emission reductions?- the evidence from industrial sub-sectors at the provincial level [J].
Zhang, Haijun ;
Duan, Maosheng ;
Deng, Zhe .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 234 :912-924
[20]   Can the pilot emission trading system coordinate the relationship between emission reduction and economic development goals in China? [J].
Zhang, Haoran ;
Liu, Yu .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 363