Has China's pilot emission trading system promoted technological progress in industrial subsectors?

被引:11
作者
Zhang, Haoran [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Yongrok [3 ]
Yang, Lingyu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xinbei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Inha Univ, Dept Intl Trade, Inharo 100, Incheon 402751, South Korea
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
emission trading system; green total factor productivity; biennial Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index; multi-period difference in differences model; mechanism test;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ac9e0c
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the 'dual carbon' goal, the key to environmental-friendly economic development is to increase total factor productivity (TFP) in a greener way. However, as a key market-based emission reduction mechanism, the exploration related to whether the emission trading system (ETS) promotes green TFP (GTFP) is not deep enough, especially for secondary decomposition of this technical index and for specific industrial subsectors. In this study, combining biennial Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index with multi-period difference in differences model, we assess the technological progress of China's pilot ETS dynamically. The results show that the pilot ETS promoted GTFP significantly in the industrial subsectors, by 8.5%. The technology change index increased by 17.5%, which is the key action path to increasing GTFP. Furtherly, the mechanism test confirms that the policy works mainly through innovation channel. This study implied that the governance toward carbon-zero economies could be accelerated much more effectively by technological innovation of green.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Cao C., 2020, MANAGE WORLD, V36, P155, DOI [10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2020.0144, DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2020.0144]
[2]   Can China's Carbon Emissions Trading Rights Mechanism Transform its Manufacturing Industry? Based on the Perspective of Enterprise Behavior [J].
Dai, Yue ;
Li, Nan ;
Gu, Rongrong ;
Zhu, Xiaodong .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (07)
[3]   Can a carbon emission trading scheme generate the Porter effect? Evidence from pilot areas in China [J].
Dong, Feng ;
Dai, Yuanju ;
Zhang, Shengnan ;
Zhang, Xiaoyun ;
Long, Ruyin .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 653 :565-577
[4]   Effects of emission trading system on green total factor productivity in China: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment [J].
Feng, Yanchao ;
Wang, Xiaohong ;
Liang, Zhou ;
Hu, Shilei ;
Xie, Yu ;
Wu, Guoyong .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 294
[5]   Modelling of carbon price in two real carbon trading markets [J].
Hao, Yan ;
Tian, Chengshi ;
Wu, Chunying .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 244
[6]   Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator [J].
Heckman, JJ ;
Ichimura, H ;
Todd, P .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1998, 65 (02) :261-294
[7]   Is emission trading scheme an opportunity for renewable energy in China? A perspective of ETS revenue redistributions [J].
Lin, Boqiang ;
Jia, Zhijie .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 263
[8]   A global Malmquist productivity index [J].
Pastor, JT ;
Lovell, CAK .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2005, 88 (02) :266-271
[9]  
Pastor JT, 2011, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V45, P10, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.SEPS.2010.09.001, 10.1016/j.seps.2010.09.001]
[10]  
Ren S., 2019, CHINA IND EC, V364, P5, DOI [10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2019.05.001, DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2019.05.001]