SEXUAL IMPRINTING: WHAT STRATEGIES SHOULD WE EXPECT TO SEE IN NATURE?

被引:13
作者
Chaffee, Dalton W. [1 ]
Griffin, Hayes [1 ]
Gilman, R. Tucker [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Natl Inst Math & Biol Synth, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Manchester, Fac Life Sci, Manchester M20 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Evolutionarily stable strategies; learning; model; sexual selection; speciation; FEMALE MATE PREFERENCES; SYMPATRIC SPECIATION; MATING PREFERENCES; PARENTAL CARE; SELECTION; EVOLUTION; CHOICE; DIMORPHISM; CONSEQUENCES; STICKLEBACKS;
D O I
10.1111/evo.12226
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Sexual imprinting occurs when juveniles learn mate preferences by observing the phenotypes of other members of their populations, and it is ubiquitous in nature. Imprinting strategies, that is which individuals and phenotypes are observed and how strong preferences become, vary among species. Imprinting can affect trait evolution and the probability of speciation, and different imprinting strategies are expected to have different effects. However, little is known about how and why different imprinting strategies evolve, or which strategies we should expect to see in nature. We used a mathematical model to study how the evolution of sexual imprinting depends on (1) imprinting costs and (2) the sex-specific fitness effects of the phenotype on which individuals imprint. We found that even small fixed costs prevent the evolution of sexual imprinting, but small relative costs do not. When imprinting does evolve, we identified the conditions under which females should evolve to imprint on their fathers, their mothers, or on other members of their populations. Our results provide testable hypotheses for empirical work and help to explain the conditions under which sexual imprinting might evolve to promote speciation.
引用
收藏
页码:3588 / 3599
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF LIMITING SIMILARITY [J].
ABRAMS, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1983, 14 :359-376
[2]  
Aoki K, 2001, EVOLUTION, V55, P25
[3]  
Bolnick DI, 2004, EVOLUTION, V58, P895
[4]   Nongenetic Inheritance and Its Evolutionary Implications [J].
Bonduriansky, Russell ;
Day, Troy .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2009, 40 :103-125
[5]   How sensory drive can promote speciation [J].
Boughman, JW .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2002, 17 (12) :571-577
[6]   Sexually Antagonistic Selection, Sexual Dimorphism, and the Resolution of Intralocus Sexual Conflict [J].
Cox, Robert M. ;
Calsbeek, Ryan .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2009, 173 (02) :176-187
[7]  
Crow JF., 1986, BASIC CONCEPTS POPUL
[8]   Public information:: From nosy neighbors to cultural evolution [J].
Danchin, É ;
Giraldeau, LA ;
Valone, TJ ;
Wagner, RH .
SCIENCE, 2004, 305 (5683) :487-491
[9]  
Dercole F, 2008, PRINC SER THEOR COMP, P1
[10]   SEXUAL SELECTION AND IMITATION - FEMALES COPY THE MATE CHOICE OF OTHERS [J].
DUGATKIN, LA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1992, 139 (06) :1384-1389