Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy: A risk score for conversion for the paradigm of difficult laparoscopic liver resections. A single centre case series

被引:11
作者
Cipriani, Federica [1 ]
Ratti, Francesca [1 ]
Fiorentini, Guido [1 ]
Catena, Marco [1 ]
Paganelli, Michele [1 ]
Aldrighetti, Luca [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Hosp, Hepatobiliary Surg Div, Via Olgettina 60, I-20132 Milan, Italy
关键词
Laparoscopic liver resection; Laparoscopic right hepatectomy; Conversion; Risk factor; Risk score; MINIMALLY INVASIVE HEPATECTOMY; MAJOR HEPATECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; SURGERY; FEASIBILITY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.013
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Converted laparoscopic hepatectomies are known to lose some advantages of the minimally-invasiveness, and factors are identified to predict patients at risk. Specific evidence for laparoscopic right hepatectomy is expected of usefulness in clinical practice, given its technical peculiarities. The purpose of the study was the identification of risk factors and the development of a risk score for conversion of laparoscopic right hepatectomy. Materials and Methods: Laparoscopic right hepatectomy performed at a single hepatobiliary surgical center were analyzed. The cohort was split in half to obtain a derivation and a validation set. Risk factors for conversion were identified by uni- and multivariable analysis. A "conversion risk score" was built assigning each factor 1 point and comparing the score with the conversion status for each patient. The accuracy was assessed by the area-under-the-receiver-operator-characteristic-curve. Results: Among 130 operations, 22 were converted (16.9%). Reasons were: 45.5% oncologic inadequacy, 31.8% bleeding, 9.1% adhesions, 9.1% biliostasis, 4.5% anaesthesiological problems. Independent risk factors for conversion were: previous lapamscopic liver surgery (Hazard Ratio 4.9, p 0.011), preoperative chemotherapy Hazard Ratio 6.2, p 0.031), malignant diagnosis (Hazard Ratio 3.3, p 0.037), closeness to hepatocaval confluence or inferior vena cava (Hazard Ratio 4.1, p 0.029), tumor volume (Hazard Ratio 2.9, p 0.024). Conversion rates correlated positively with the score, raising from 0 to 100% when the score increased from 0 to 5 (Spearman: p 0.032 in the derivation set, p 0.020 in the validation set). The risk of conversion showed a sharp increase passing from class 3 to 4, reaching a probability estimated between 60 and 71.4%. The score showed good accuracy (area-under-the-receiver-operator-characteristic-curve 0.82). Conclusion: Specific risk factors for conversion are identified for laparoscopic right hepatectomy. This score may help in standardizing the choice of a pure laparoscopic or open approach for such challenging resections.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 115
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery From Indication to Implementation
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Dagher, Ibrahim
    Edwin, Bjorn
    Troisi, Roberto Ivan
    Alikhanov, Ruslan
    Aroori, Somaiah
    Belli, Giulio
    Besselink, Marc
    Briceno, Javier
    Gayet, Brice
    D'Hondt, Mathieu
    Lesurtel, Mickael
    Menon, Krishna
    Lodge, Peter
    Rotellar, Fernando
    Santoyo, Julio
    Scatton, Olivier
    Soubrane, Olivier
    Sutcliffe, Robert
    Van Dam, Ronald
    White, Steve
    Halls, Mark Christopher
    Cipriani, Federica
    Van der Poel, Marcel
    Ciria, Ruben
    Barkhatov, Leonid
    Gomez-Luque, Yrene
    Ocana-Garcia, Sira
    Cook, Andrew
    Buell, Joseph
    Clavien, Pierre-Alain
    Dervenis, Christos
    Fusai, Giuseppe
    Geller, David
    Lang, Hauke
    Primrose, John
    Taylor, Mark
    Van Gulik, Thomas
    Wakabayashi, Go
    Asbun, Horacio
    Cherqui, Daniel
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [2] Single-Centre Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hepatectomy
    Abu Hilal, Mohammed
    Di Fabio, Francesco
    Teng, Mabel Joey
    Lykoudis, Pavlos
    Primrose, John Neil
    Pearce, Neil William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2011, 15 (05) : 818 - 823
  • [3] The PROCESS 2018 statement: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasE Series in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines
    Agha, Riaz A.
    Borrelli, Mimi R.
    Farwana, Reem
    Koshy, Kiron
    Fowler, Alexander J.
    Orgill, Dennis P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 60 : 279 - 282
  • [4] Ultrasonic-mediated laparoscopic liver transection
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Pulitano, Carlo
    Arru, Marcella
    Catena, Marco
    Guzzetti, Eleonora
    Casati, Massimiliano
    Ferla, Gianfranco
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 195 (02) : 270 - 272
  • [5] A stepwise learning curve to define the standard for technical improvement in laparoscopic liver resections: complexity-based analysis in 1032 procedures
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Cipriani, Federica
    Fiorentini, Guido
    Catena, Marco
    Paganelli, Michele
    Ratti, Francesca
    [J]. UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2019, 71 (02) : 273 - 283
  • [6] Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: a snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Ratti, Francesca
    Cillo, Umberto
    Ferrero, Alessandro
    Ettorre, Giuseppe Maria
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    Giuliante, Felice
    Calise, Fulvio
    [J]. UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2017, 69 (03) : 271 - 283
  • [7] Italian experience in minimally invasive liver surgery: a national survey
    Aldrighetti L.
    Belli G.
    Boni L.
    Cillo U.
    Ettorre G.
    De Carlis L.
    Pinna A.
    Casciola L.
    Calise F.
    Corrado F.
    Federica C.
    Francesca R.
    Elisa C.
    Enrico G.
    Roberto S.
    Stefano D.
    Antonio G.
    Paolo R.
    Roberto S.
    Marcello S.
    Mario M.
    Marco F.
    Giuseppe N.
    Giorgio E.
    Alberto P.
    Lorenzo C.
    Marco C.
    Gennaro N.
    Mario G.
    Nicolò B.
    Maria di Cà S.
    Alberto B.
    Giovanni S.
    Maurizio B.
    Maurizio B.
    Elio J.
    Marco S.
    Francesco C.
    Francesco C.
    Valle Raffaele D.
    Michele C.
    Riuniti O.
    Riuniti O.
    Pietro M.
    Carmine Gianfranco D.
    Alfredo G.
    Isidoro D.
    Salvatore G.
    Adelmo A.
    Goffredo C.
    [J]. Updates in Surgery, 2015, 67 (2) : 129 - 140
  • [8] A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection
    Ban, Daisuke
    Tanabe, Minoru
    Ito, Hiromitsu
    Otsuka, Yuichiro
    Nitta, Hiroyuki
    Abe, Yuta
    Hasegawa, Yasushi
    Katagiri, Toshio
    Takagi, Chisato
    Itano, Osamu
    Kaneko, Hironori
    Wakabayashi, Go
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (10) : 745 - 753
  • [9] Can retrohepatic tunnel be quickly and easily established for laparoscopic liver hanging maneuver by Goldfinger dissector in laparoscopic right hepatectomy?
    Cai, Liu-xin
    Wei, Fang-qiang
    Yu, Yi-chen
    Cai, Xiu-jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2016, 17 (09): : 712 - 721
  • [10] Risk factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic major liver resection
    Cauchy, F.
    Fuks, D.
    Nomi, T.
    Schwarz, L.
    Barbier, L.
    Dokmak, S.
    Scatton, O.
    Belghiti, J.
    Soubrane, O.
    Gayet, B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (07) : 785 - 795