Effects of flipper bands and injected transponders on the survival of adult Little Penguins Eudyptula minor

被引:18
作者
Dann, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Sidhu, Leesa A. [2 ]
Jessop, Roz [1 ]
Renwick, Leanne [1 ]
Healy, Margaret [1 ]
Dettmann, Belinda
Baker, Barry [3 ,4 ]
Catchpole, Edward A.
机构
[1] Phillip Isl Nat Pk, Res Grp, Phillip Isl, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Phys Environm & Math Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Sch Govt, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[4] Univ Tasmania, Antarctic Climate Ecosyst Cooperat Res Ctr, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
apparent survival; marking and tagging techniques; seabirds; southeastern Australia; tag loss; MARK-RECAPTURE; PHILLIP-ISLAND; NECK BANDS; VICTORIA; MORTALITY; RECOVERY; BEHAVIOR; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1111/ibi.12122
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Tagging is essential for many types of ecological and behavioural studies, and it is generally assumed that it does not affect the fitness of the individuals being examined. However, the tagging of birds has been shown to have negative effects on some aspects of their lives. Here we investigate the influence of tagging on apparent survival. We examined the effects of flipper bands and injected transponders on the apparent survival of adult Little Penguins by comparing the survival probabilities of 2483 Little Penguins marked at Phillip Island, Australia, between 1995 and 2001 in one of three ways: with bands, with transponders or with both. The design of the study and our method of analysis allowed us to estimate tag loss and ensured that tag loss did not bias the survival estimates. Birds marked with flipper bands had lower survival probabilities than those marked with transponders (with apparent survival probabilities in the first year after tagging of 75% for banded birds and 80% for birds fitted with transponders, and in subsequent years of 87% for banded birds and 91% for birds fitted with transponders). We estimated both band and transponder loss probabilities for the first time, and found that transponder loss probabilities were substantially higher than band loss probabilities, particularly in the first year after marking when the tag loss probability was 5% for transponders and 0.7% for bands. Survival probabilities were lower in the first year after marking than in subsequent years for all birds. Studies of penguins that have used flipper bands to identify individuals may have underestimated annual adult survival probabilities, as banded penguins were likely to have lower than average survival probabilities than those of unbanded birds. The higher annual survival probabilities of individuals marked with transponders indicate that this should be the preferred marking technique for Little Penguins. However, future studies will, like ours, need to consider the higher rates of transponder loss when estimating survival, possibly by double-tagging some birds.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 83
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Do implanted data-loggers affect the time spent at sea by Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) during winter?
    Ritchie, W. J.
    Green, J. A.
    Dann, P.
    Butler, P. J.
    Frappell, P. B.
    EMU-AUSTRAL ORNITHOLOGY, 2010, 110 (01): : 71 - 77
  • [22] Anthropogenic trauma is the most prevalent cause of mortality in Little Penguins, Eudyptula minor, in Perth, Western Australia
    Cannell, B. L.
    Campbell, K.
    Fitzgerald, L.
    Lewis, J. A.
    Baran, I. J.
    Stephens, N. S.
    EMU-AUSTRAL ORNITHOLOGY, 2016, 116 (01): : 52 - 61
  • [23] Subtle genetic clustering among South Australian colonies of little penguins (Eudyptula minor)
    Colombelli-Negrel, Diane
    Slender, Amy
    Bradford, Tessa
    Bertozzi, Terry
    Graf, Scarlett S.
    Gardner, Michael G.
    CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2020, 21 (04) : 747 - 756
  • [24] Quantity over quality? Prey-field characteristics influence the foraging decisions of little penguins (Eudyptula minor)
    Sutton, G. J.
    Arnould, J. P. Y.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (06):
  • [25] The pathology and pathogenicity of a novel Haemoproteus spp. infection in wild Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor)
    Cannell, B. L.
    Krasnec, K. V.
    Campbell, K.
    Jones, H. I.
    Miller, R. D.
    Stephens, N.
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2013, 197 (1-2) : 74 - 84
  • [26] Little penguins, Eudyptula minor, show increased avoidance, aggression and vigilance in response to zoo visitors
    Sherwen, Sally L.
    Magrath, Michael J. L.
    Butler, Kym L.
    Hemsworth, Paul H.
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2015, 168 : 71 - 76
  • [27] The effect of investigator disturbance on egg laying, chick survival and fledging mass of short-tailed shearwaters (Puffinus tenuirostris) and little penguins (Eudyptula minor)
    Vertigan, C.
    McMahon, C. R.
    Andrews-Goff, V.
    Hindell, M. A.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2012, 21 (01) : 101 - 111
  • [28] Variability in at-sea foraging behaviour of little penguins Eudyptula minor in response to fine-scale environmental features
    Phillips, Lachlan R.
    Hindell, Mark
    Hobday, Alistair J.
    Lea, Mary-Anne
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2019, 627 : 141 - 154
  • [29] Individual variation and repeatability of corticosterone responses of little penguins (Eudyptula minor) sampled in two successive years at Oamaru, New Zealand
    Cockrem, John F.
    Candy, E. Jane
    Barrett, D. Paul
    Agnew, Philippa
    Potter, Murray A.
    GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 244 : 86 - 92
  • [30] Reproductive performance of little penguins Eudyptula minor in relation to year, age, pair-bond duration, breeding date and individual quality
    Nisbet, Ian C. T.
    Dann, Peter
    JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, 2009, 40 (03) : 296 - 308