Using genetic programming for symbolic regression to detect climate change signatures

被引:0
作者
Ricketts, J. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] IEEE Computat Intelligence Soc, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
来源
20TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2013) | 2013年
关键词
Genetic programming; empirical mode decomposition (EMD); stepwise symbolic decomposition (SSD); sea level rise;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Most often, climate change signals are slow moving (in human terms), low amplitude changes embedded in high amplitude, noisy data. There are many techniques for extracting such signals. This paper introduces a technique which in contrast with empirical methods produces a decomposition of a time series into a set of equations plus a "residual". This is referred to as stepwise symbolic secomposition (SSD). The extraction of symbolic equations in lieu of empirical functions assists with characterization of time series. This paper takes two examples of climate data, and applies two different techniques for characterising the low amplitude, slow change embedded therein. The record of CO2 levels at Mauna-Loa since March 1958, is used to demonstrate and contrast empirical mode decomposition (EMD), and SSD. The mean monthly tidal gauge records from the small number of gauges which have more than 120 years of data are analysed in more detail by SSD, then three techniques are used to characterize the residual. The techniques are (a) LOESS smoothing, (b) EMD, and (c) high order polynomial regression. SSD uses a genetic programming system called Eureqa from Cornell Creative Machines Lab guided by an information metric, to extract the most compact informative function it can at each step; the process is repeated on the residuals until no sufficiently informative function is found. EMD and SSD are in stark contrast in the order in which signals are decomposed. EMD extracts high frequency components first. SSD extracts components based on a mixture of parsimonious representation and variance explained. EMD leaves a low frequency filtrate of the signal in its residue, SSD tends to operate as a broad band filter, leaving high frequency noise plus a possible low frequency signal. EMD, LOESS and polynomial fitting all serve to extract low frequency components of the signal from this SSD residual. For the set of tidal gauge data, in the absence of a change in global sea level rise, the SSD procedure should randomize all segments of residual signals equally - the residual should be whitened with respect to the initial signal. It is shown however that late 20th century portions of the residuals show behaviour that is consistent with accelerating sea level rise in keeping with the bulk of the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 697
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] GPTIPS: An Open Source Genetic Programming Toolbox For Multigene Symbolic Regression
    Searson, Dominic P.
    Leahy, David E.
    Willis, Mark J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MULTICONFERENCE OF ENGINEERS AND COMPUTER SCIENTISTS (IMECS 2010), VOLS I-III, 2010, : 77 - +
  • [32] Parsimony Measures in Multi-objective Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Burlacu, Bogdan
    Kronberger, Gabriel
    Kommenda, Michael
    Affenzeller, Michael
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION (GECCCO'19 COMPANION), 2019, : 338 - 339
  • [33] Parallel implementation of a genetic-programming based tool for symbolic regression
    Salhi, A
    Glaser, H
    De Roure, D
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1998, 66 (06) : 299 - 307
  • [34] Genetic programming performance prediction and its application for symbolic regression problems
    Astarabadi, Samaneh Sadat Mousavi
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 502 : 418 - 433
  • [35] Adaptive Weighted Splines - A New Representation to Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Raymond, Christian
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Zhang, Mengjie
    [J]. GECCO'20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2020, : 1003 - 1011
  • [36] On the Application of Symbolic Regression and Genetic Programming for Cryptanalysis of Symmetric Encryption Algorithm
    Smetka, Tomas
    Homoliak, Ivan
    Hanacek, Petr
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CARNAHAN CONFERENCE ON SECURITY TECHNOLOGY (ICCST), 2016, : 305 - 312
  • [37] Active Learning Informs Symbolic Regression Model Development in Genetic Programming
    Haut, Nathan
    Punch, Bill
    Banzhaf, Wolfgang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2023 COMPANION, 2023, : 587 - 590
  • [38] RANSAC-GP: Dealing with Outliers in Symbolic Regression with Genetic Programming
    Lopez, Uriel
    Trujillo, Leonardo
    Martinez, Yuliana
    Legrand, Pierrick
    Naredo, Enrique
    Silva, Sara
    [J]. GENETIC PROGRAMMING, EUROGP 2017, 2017, 10196 : 114 - 130
  • [39] Improving Generalisation of Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression with Structural Risk Minimisation
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Shang, Lin
    Zhang, Mengjie
    [J]. GECCO'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2016, : 709 - 716
  • [40] Evolvability Degeneration in Multi-Objective Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Liu, Dazhuang
    Virgolin, Marco
    Alderliesten, Tanja
    Bosman, Peter A. N.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'22), 2022, : 973 - 981