Elections;
Campaigns;
Voting behavior;
Methodology;
Public opinion;
Survey;
VOTING DECISION;
VOTE DECISION;
MEDIA USE;
ELECTION;
D O I:
10.1007/s11109-011-9182-9
中图分类号:
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号:
0302 ;
030201 ;
摘要:
This paper evaluates the two most common methods of measuring voter time-of-decision-the recall method and the panel method-and asks whether the two methods are consistent with each other. Using data from the National Annenberg Election Survey collected during the 2008 U.S. presidential election, the findings suggest that these two methods measure different concepts, and thus cannot be used interchangeably. Furthermore, discrepancies between the two methods suggest that the accepted model of early, campaign, and late decision-making should be adjusted to account for a fourth group of voters that never changes their vote intention, but does not truly commit to that intention until later in the campaign. The concept of uncommitted early deciders is offered to describe this group, created by combining the two methods.
机构:
James Madison Univ, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USAJames Madison Univ, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
Schill, Dan
Kirk, Rita
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
So Methodist Univ, Dallas, TX 75275 USA
So Methodist Univ, Cary M Maguire Ctr Eth & Publ Responsibil, Dallas, TX 75275 USAJames Madison Univ, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA