Sensitivity analysis methods for building energy models: Comparing computational costs and extractable information

被引:148
作者
Menberg, Kathrin [1 ,2 ]
Heo, Yeonsook [2 ]
Choudhary, Ruchi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Trumpington St, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Architecture, 1-5 Scroope Terrace, Cambridge CB2 1PX, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Building energy model; Sensitivity analysis; Morris method; Sobol method; Regression analysis; MATHEMATICAL-MODELS; OUTPUT; UNCERTAINTY; DESIGN; SIMULATIONS; CALIBRATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.10.005
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Though sensitivity analysis has been widely applied in the context of building energy models (BEMs), there are few studies that investigate the performance of different sensitivity analysis methods in relation to dynamic, high-order, non-linear behaviour and the level of uncertainty in building energy models. We scrutinise three distinctive sensitivity analysis methods: (a) the computationally efficient Morris method for parameter screening, (b) linear regression analysis (medium computational costs) and (c) Sobol method (high computational costs). It is revealed that the results from Morris method taking the commonly used measure for parameter influence can be unstable, while using the median value yields robust results for evaluations with small sample sizes. For the dominant parameters the results from all three sensitivity analysis methods are in very good agreement. Regarding the evaluation of parameter ranking or the differentiation of influential and negligible parameters, the computationally costly quantitative methods provide the same information for the model in this study as the computational efficient Morris method using the median value. Exploring different methods to investigate higher-order effects and parameter interactions, reveals that correlation of elementary effects and parameter values in Morris method can also provide basic information about parameter interactions. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 445
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]  
Dunn O.J., 2009, Basic Statistics: A Primer for the Biomedical Sciences, Vfourth
[12]   Uncertainty and sensitivity decomposition of building energy models [J].
Eisenhower, Bryan ;
O'Neill, Zheng ;
Fonoberov, Vladimir A. ;
Mezic, Igor .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION, 2012, 5 (03) :171-184
[13]   State of the art in building modelling and energy performances prediction: A review [J].
Foucquier, Aurelie ;
Robert, Sylvain ;
Suard, Frederic ;
Stephan, Louis ;
Jay, Arnaud .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 23 :272-288
[14]   Application of sensitivity analysis in design of sustainable buildings [J].
Heiselberg, Per ;
Brohus, Henrik ;
Hesselholt, Allan ;
Rasmussen, Henrik ;
Seinre, Erkki ;
Thomas, Sara .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2009, 34 (09) :2030-2036
[15]   Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty [J].
Heo, Y. ;
Choudhary, R. ;
Augenbroe, G. A. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 47 :550-560
[16]   Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models [J].
Homma, T ;
Saltelli, A .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 52 (01) :1-17
[17]   Multivariate regression as an energy assessment tool in early building design [J].
Hygh, Janelle S. ;
DeCarolis, Joseph F. ;
Hill, David B. ;
Ranjithan, S. Ranji .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 57 :165-175
[18]   Analysis of variance designs for model output [J].
Jansen, MJW .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 117 (1-2) :35-43
[19]   Choosing the appropriate sensitivity analysis method for building energy model-based investigations [J].
Kristensen, Martin Heine ;
Petersen, Steffen .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 130 :166-176
[20]   Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures [J].
Kucherenko, S. ;
Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. ;
Pantelides, C. ;
Shah, N. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (07) :1135-1148