Do clickers improve library instruction? Lock in your answers now

被引：16

作者：

Dill, Emily ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ Columbus, Bloomington, IN USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP | 2008年 / 34卷 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.acalib.2008.09.004

中图分类号：

G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];

学科分类号：

1205 ; 120501 ;

摘要：

This study assesses the effect of clickers on retention of library instruction material. A comparison of quiz results of students who utilized clickers during instruction versus students who did not showed no gain in retention. Libraries are encouraged to consider pedagogical implications before applying novel technologies to instruction programs.

引用

页码：527 / 529

页数：3

共 9 条

[1] Comparing the effectiveness on student achievement of a student response system versus Online WebCT quizzes [J].

Bunce, DM ;

VandenPlas, JR ;

Havanki, KL .

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 83 (03) :488-493

[2]

BURNETT S, 2007, J INFORM LIT, V1

[3] Investigating the Effects of Group Response Systems on Student Satisfaction, Learning, and Engagement in Accounting Education [J].

Carnaghan, Carla ;

Webb, Alan .

ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION, 2007, 22 (03) :391-409

[4]

DEARING K, 2006, TENNESSEE LIB Q J TE, V56, P74

[5]

Duncan D., 2006, ASTRONOMY ED REV, V5, P70, DOI [10.3847/AER2006005, DOI 10.3847/AER2006005]

[6]

Judson E., 2002, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, V21, P167

[7]

MEYERS C, 1993, PROMOTING ACTIVE LEA, P7

[8] Does active learning work? A review of the research [J].

Prince, M .

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2004, 93 (03) :223-231

[9]

Smith P., 2004, EDUCAUSE Review, V39, P48

← 1 →