The radiation exposure of fish in the period of the Techa river peak contamination

被引:3
|
作者
Shishkina, E. A. [1 ,2 ]
Pryakhin, E. A. [1 ]
Sharagin, P. A. [1 ]
Osipov, D. I. [1 ]
Tryapitsina, G. A. [1 ,2 ]
Atamanyuk, N. I. [1 ]
Egoreichenkov, E. A. [1 ]
Trapeznikov, A. V. [3 ]
Rudolfsen, G. [4 ,5 ]
Teien, H. C. [6 ]
Sneve, M. K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Urals Res Ctr Radiat Med, 68A Vorovsky Str, Chelyabinsk 454076, Russia
[2] Chelyabinsk State Univ, Chelyabinsk, Russia
[3] Russian Acad Sci, IPAE, Ural Branch, Ekaterinburg, Russia
[4] Norwegian Radiat Protect Author, Osteras, Norway
[5] Univ Tromso, Tromso, Norway
[6] Norwegian Univ Life Sci NMBU, Ctr Excellence Environm Radioact CERAD, As, Norway
关键词
Wildlife dosimetry; Fish; The techa river; Retrospective dosimetry; Morphometry; Environmental contamination; ROACH RUTILUS-RUTILUS; RADIONUCLIDE TRANSFER; CONCENTRATION RATIOS; AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS; DYNAMIC-MODEL; RESERVOIRS; RECONSTRUCTION; CS-137; LEVEL; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Waterborne radioactive releases into the Techa River from the Mayak Production Association in Russia during 1949-1956 resulted in downstream contamination of the river ecosystem. The discharged liquid waste contained both short-lived isotopes (Zr-95, Nb-95, Ru-103,Ru-106, Ce-141,Ce-144, Y-91, Sr-89 and Ba-140 with half-life from 3 days to 1.02 years) and the long-lived Sr-90 and Cs-137 (half-life - 28.79 y and 30.07 y, respectively). Even now, when two half-lives of Sr-90 and Cs-137 have passed, the contamination in the upper river region (about 70 km from the source of releases) is still relatively high. Current anthropogenic dose rates calculated for the fish of the Techa River depend on the distance along the stream and decrease from 150 to 3 mu Gy day(-1). Radiation exposure of fish is expected to have been much higher at the time of the releases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dose rates for the most common fish species of the river, viz., roach (Rutilus rutilus), perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pike (Esox lucius), in the period of peak contamination of the upper reaches of the Techa River from 1950 to 1951. To achieve this objective, calculation of both internal and external dose rates was performed. For dose rate calculation, the contamination of the river compartments was modeled, body-size dependent dose coefficients were evaluated, morphometric data were analyzed. Maximum dose rates were obtained for roach; minimum - for pike, it depends on fish lifestyle (time spent at the bottom). In the period before September 1950, fish of the upper reaches are assessed to have been exposed to dose rates exceeding the screening level equal to 240 mu Gy day(-1). From September 1950 up to the end of 1952 the fish dose rates along the Techa River were found to be close to the UNSCEAR threshold equal to 9.6 x 10(3) mu Gy day(-1) or even much more higher (up to 1.9 x 10(5) mu Gy day(-1)). Extremely high historical dose rates did not lead to the difference in fish size and fish growth rate currently observed in the Techa River and in the comparison waterbody (the Miass River). Discussion includes the description of radiation effects observed currently in the river fish. Today the effects observed in hematopoietic system may be the consequence of radiation exposure of fish over several generations. For example, long term dwelling of fish in the radioactively contaminated environment leads to their adaptation to chronic radiation exposure. At the same time, an increase their sensitivity and decrease their adaptive capacity to respond to other stress factors can be observed.z
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 55
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reply to “On the low-dose radiation exposure in the Techa River Cohort and mortality from circulatory diseases” by Jargin (2013)
    L. Yu Krestinina
    A. V. Akleyev
    Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2013, 52 : 421 - 423
  • [32] CANCER MORTALITY AND RADIATION RISK-EVALUATION FOR THE TECHA RIVER POPULATION
    KOSSENKO, MM
    DEGTEVA, MO
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1994, 142 (1-2) : 73 - 89
  • [33] Reply to "On the low-dose radiation exposure in the Techa River Cohort and mortality from circulatory diseases" by Jargin (2013)
    Krestinina, L. Yu
    Akleyev, A. V.
    RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 2013, 52 (03) : 421 - 423
  • [34] 137Cs contamination of the Techa river flood plain near the village of Muslumovo
    Chesnokov, AV
    Govorun, AP
    Linnik, VG
    Shcherbak, SB
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2000, 50 (03) : 179 - 191
  • [35] TREATMENT OF RADIATION EXPOSURE AND CONTAMINATION
    WAGNER, RH
    BOLES, MA
    HENKIN, RE
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 1994, 14 (02) : 387 - 396
  • [36] Radioactive Contamination of Coastal Regions due to Aqueous Aerosol Entrainment from the Techa River Area
    Yu. G. Mokrov
    Radiochemistry, 2023, 65 : S147 - S159
  • [37] Preliminary FISH-Based Assessment of External Dose for Residents Exposed on the Techa River
    Vozilova, A. V.
    Shagina, N. B.
    Degteva, M. O.
    Edwards, A. A.
    Ainsbury, E. A.
    Moquet, J. E.
    Hone, P.
    Lloyd, D. C.
    Fomina, J. N.
    Darroudi, F.
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 177 (01) : 84 - 91
  • [38] Simple model for the reconstruction of radionuclide concentrations and radiation exposures along the Techa River
    Vorobiova, MI
    Degteva, MO
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1999, 77 (02): : 142 - 149
  • [39] Radioactive Contamination of Coastal Regions due to Aqueous Aerosol Entrainment from the Techa River Area
    Mokrov, Yu. G.
    RADIOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 65 (SUPPL 1) : S147 - S159
  • [40] Reconstruction of the contamination of the Techa River in 1949–1951 as a result of releases from the “MAYAK” Production Association
    N. B. Shagina
    M. I. Vorobiova
    M. O. Degteva
    L. M. Peremyslova
    E. A. Shishkina
    L. R. Anspaugh
    B. A. Napier
    Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2012, 51 : 349 - 366