Membrane fouling during ultrafiltration (UF) of surface water: Effects of sludge discharge interval (SDI)

被引:26
作者
Bai, Langming [1 ]
Qu, Fangshu [1 ]
Liang, Heng [1 ]
Ma, Jun [1 ]
Chang, Haiqing [1 ]
Wang, Meilian [1 ]
Li, Guibai [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, SKLUWRE, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ultrafiltration; Sludge discharge interval; Membrane fouling; Fouling mechanisms; Water treatment; SOLUBLE MICROBIAL PRODUCTS; DISSOLVED ORGANIC-MATTER; BIOREACTOR; MECHANISMS; RETENTION; PRETREATMENT; FILTRATION; NOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2013.04.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The impact of sludge discharge on membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water was investigated in this study. Discharge sludge and without discharge during UF were compared by measuring the increase of transmembrane pressure (TMP) and the accumulation of foulants with running time was studied. It was found that turbidity and dissolved organic carbon of retentate solution apparently increased as UF proceeded. Three-dimensional excitation/emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy analyses of raw water and retentate solution demonstrated that UF could lead to the accumulation of humic and protein-like substances. Filtration experiments showed that membrane fouling could be alleviated by discharging the retentate solution after physical cleaning due to the reduced cake layer formation and concentration polarization. In addition, effects of sludge discharge intervals on the TMP and fouling characteristics were further investigated. Results indicated that short SDI would benefit control of both reversible and irreversible fouling. However, frequent discharge of retentate solution may increase the self-use water and decrease the water production rate of the UF system, leading to an expansion of running cost. In general, SDI was a critically important factor for both membrane fouling and water production rate. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 24
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Removal of disinfection by-product precursors by UF and NF membranes in low-SUVA waters [J].
Ates, Nuray ;
Yilmaz, Levent ;
Kitis, Mehmet ;
Yetis, Ulku .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2009, 328 (1-2) :104-112
[2]   Critical and sustainable fluxes: Theory, experiments and applications [J].
Bacchin, P. ;
Aimar, P. ;
Field, R. W. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 281 (1-2) :42-69
[3]   Analysis of fouling mechanisms in anaerobic membrane bioreactors [J].
Charfi, Amine ;
Ben Amar, Nihel ;
Harmand, Jerome .
WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (08) :2637-2650
[4]   Spectrometric characterization of effluent organic matter of a sequencing batch reactor operated at three sludge retention times [J].
Esparza-Soto, M. ;
Nunez-Hernandez, S. ;
Fall, C. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2011, 45 (19) :6555-6563
[5]   Extra-cellular polysaccharides, soluble microbial products, and natural organic matter impact on nanofiltration membranes flux decline [J].
Fonseca, A. Cristina ;
Summers, R. Scott ;
Greenberg, Alan R. ;
Hernandez, Mark T. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (07) :2491-2497
[6]   Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: A review [J].
Gao, Wei ;
Liang, Heng ;
Ma, Jun ;
Han, Mei ;
Chen, Zhong-lin ;
Han, Zheng-shuang ;
Li, Gui-bai .
DESALINATION, 2011, 272 (1-3) :1-8
[7]   Effects of magnetic ion exchange pretreatment on low pressure membrane filtration of natural surface water [J].
Huang, Haiou ;
Cho, Hyun-Hee ;
Schwab, Kellogg J. ;
Jacangelo, Joseph G. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (17) :5483-5490
[8]   A new method for the evaluation of the reversible and irreversible fouling propensity of MBR mixed liquor [J].
Huyskens, C. ;
Brauns, E. ;
Van Hoof, E. ;
De Wever, H. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2008, 323 (01) :185-192
[9]   Influence of interactions between NOM and particles on UF fouling mechanisms [J].
Jermann, D. ;
Pronk, W. ;
Kaegi, R. ;
Halbeisen, M. ;
Boller, M. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2008, 42 (14) :3870-3878
[10]   Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production [J].
Jermann, D. ;
Pronk, W. ;
Meylan, S. ;
Boller, M. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2007, 41 (08) :1713-1722