Cognitive control influences the use of meaning relations during spoken sentence comprehension

被引:22
作者
Boudewyn, Megan A. [1 ]
Long, Debra L.
Swaab, Tamara Y.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
N400; Lexical association; Individual differences; Cognitive control; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; BRAIN POTENTIALS; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; WORD REPETITION; CARPENTER; 1992; LEVEL CONTEXT; DISCOURSE; N400;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.019
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate individual differences in the influence of lexical association on word recognition during auditory sentence processing. Lexical associations among individual words (e.g. salt and pepper) represent one type of semantic information that is available during the processing of words in context. We predicted that individuals would vary in their sensitivity to this type of local context as a function of suppression ability and working-memory capacity. Lexical association was manipulated in auditory sentence contexts, and multiple regression analyses were employed to examine the relation between individuals' brain responses to meaning relations in sentences and measures of working-memory capacity, cognitive control and vocabulary. Lexical association influenced the processing of words that were embedded in sentences and also showed a great deal of individual variability. Specifically, suppression ability emerged as a significant predictor of sensitivity to lexical association, such that individuals who performed poorly on our measure of suppression ability (the Stroop task), compared to those who performed well, showed larger N400 effects of lexical association. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2659 / 2668
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF SUBPHONETIC DIFFERENCES ON LEXICAL ACCESS [J].
ANDRUSKI, JE ;
BLUMSTEIN, SE ;
BURTON, M .
COGNITION, 1994, 52 (03) :163-187
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Event-related potentials
[3]   Is phonological information mapped onto semantic information in a one-to-one manner? [J].
Bölte, J ;
Coenen, E .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 81 (1-3) :384-397
[4]   Does discourse congruence influence spoken language comprehension before lexical association? Evidence from event-related potentials [J].
Boudewyn, Megan A. ;
Gordon, Peter C. ;
Long, Debra ;
Polse, Lara ;
Swaab, Tamara Y. .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2012, 27 (05) :698-733
[5]   Processing new and repeated names: Effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP [J].
Camblin, C. Christine ;
Ledoux, Kerry ;
Boudewyn, Megan ;
Gordon, Peter C. ;
Swaab, Tamara Y. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1146 :172-184
[6]   The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking [J].
Camblin, C. Christine ;
Gordon, Peter C. ;
Swaab, Tamara Y. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2007, 56 (01) :103-128
[7]   WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY AS LONG-TERM-MEMORY ACTIVATION - AN INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES APPROACH [J].
CANTOR, J ;
ENGLE, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (05) :1101-1114
[8]  
Caplan D, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P77
[9]   CONSTRAINTS ON SEMANTIC PRIMING IN READING - A FIXATION TIME ANALYSIS [J].
CARROLL, P ;
SLOWIACZEK, ML .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1986, 14 (06) :509-522
[10]  
Clifton C., 2003, J MEMORY LANGUAGE