Minimum Effective Volume of Lidocaine for Double-Injection Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Block

被引:35
作者
Gonzalez, Andrea P. [1 ]
Bernucci, Francisca [1 ]
Pham, Kevin [1 ]
Correa, Jose A. [2 ]
Finlayson, Roderick J. [1 ]
Tran, De Q. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Montreal Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCK; EFFECTIVE ANESTHETIC VOLUME; SUPRACLAVICULAR BLOCK; DOWN DESIGN; GUIDANCE; NERVE;
D O I
10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182707176
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the minimum effective volume of lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 5 mu g/mL in 90% of patients (MEV90) for double-injection ultrasound-guided axillary block (AXB). Methods: All subjects received a double-injection ultrasound-guided AXB with lidocaine 1.5% and epinephrine 5 mu g/mL. A 17-gauge, 8-cm Tuohy needle was initially advanced until its tip was positioned next to the musculocutaneous nerve. Volume assignment was carried out using a biased coin design up-and-down sequential method, where the volume of local anesthetic administered to each patient depended on the response of the previous one. In case of failure, the next subject received a higher volume (defined as the previous volume with an increment of 1.0 mL). If the previous patient had a successful block, the next subject was randomized to a lower volume (defined as the previous volume with a decrement of 1.0 mL), with a probability of b = 0.11, or the same volume, with a probability of 1 - b = 0.89. After injection of the musculocutaneous nerve, the needle was redirected toward the dorsal aspect of the axillary artery. For this second injection, volume assignment was carried out in a similar fashion; however, volume increments/decrements were 3.0 instead of 1.0 mL. Using a composite scale encompassing sensory and motor block, success was defined, at 30 minutes, as a composite score of 4 points (out of 4 points), and 10 points (out of 12 points) for the musculocutaneous and perivascular injection, respectively. Patients undergoing surgery of the forearm, wrist, or hand were prospectively enrolled until 45 successful musculocutaneous blocks or 45 successful perivascular injections were obtained. Results: Fifty patients were included in the study. Using isotonic regression and bootstrap confidence interval (CI), the MEV90 was estimated to be 5.5 mL (95% CI, 3.0-6.7 mL) and 23.5 mL (95% CI, 23.1-23.9 mL) for the musculocutaneous and perivascular injection, respectively. Conclusions: For double-injection ultrasound-guided AXB, the MEV90 of lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 5 mu g/mL is 5.5 and 23.5 mL for the musculocutaneous nerve and perivascular injection, respectively. Further dose-finding studies are required for other concentrations of lidocaine, other local anesthetic agents, and other techniques for ultrasound-guided AXB. (Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38: 16-20)
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 20
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between Perivascular and Perineural Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block [J].
Bernucci, Francisca ;
Gonzalez, Andrea P. ;
Finlayson, Roderick J. ;
Tran, De Q. H. .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2012, 37 (05) :473-477
[2]   APPROXIMATE INFERENCE IN GENERALIZED LINEAR MIXED MODELS [J].
BRESLOW, NE ;
CLAYTON, DG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 88 (421) :9-25
[3]   Effects of ultrasound guidance on the minimum effective anaesthetic volume required to block the femoral nerve [J].
Casati, A. ;
Baciarello, M. ;
Di Cianni, S. ;
Danelli, G. ;
De Marco, G. ;
Leone, S. ;
Rossi, M. ;
Fanelli, G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 98 (06) :823-827
[4]   A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for multiple injection axillary brachial plexus block [J].
Casati, Andrea ;
Danelli, Giorgio ;
Baciarello, Marco ;
Corradi, Maurizio ;
Leone, Stefania ;
Di Cianni, Simone ;
Fanelli, Guido .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 106 (05) :992-996
[5]   Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block [J].
Chan, Vincent W. S. ;
Perlas, Anahi ;
McCartney, Colin J. L. ;
Brull, Richard ;
Xu, Daquan ;
Abbas, Sherif .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2007, 54 (03) :176-182
[6]  
De Tran QH, 2007, CAN J ANAESTH, V54, P662, DOI 10.1007/BF03022962
[7]   A METHOD FOR OBTAINING AND ANALYZING SENSITIVITY DATA [J].
DIXON, WJ ;
MOOD, AM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1948, 43 (241) :109-126
[8]   A random walk rule for phase I clinical trials [J].
Durham, SD ;
Flournoy, N ;
Rosenberger, WF .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (02) :745-760
[9]   What if half of your patients moved (or remembered or did something else bad) at incision? [J].
Fisher, Dennis .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 107 (01) :1-2
[10]   Minimum volume of local anaesthetic required to surround each of the constituent nerves of the axillary brachial plexus, using ultrasound guidance: a pilot study [J].
Harper, G. K. ;
Stafford, M. A. ;
Hill, D. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 104 (05) :633-636