Pragmatism or what? The future of US foreign policy

被引:9
作者
Milne, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01112.x
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article discusses the intellectual sources of the presidential candidates' foreign policies. In the case of Barack Obama, the article examines the formation of his worldview, his intellectual inspirations, his most significant foreign policy appointments and the diplomatic course he has pursued as president. Mitt Romney's foreign policy views are harder to identify with certainty, but his business and political careeras well as the identity and dispositions of his advisory teamall provide important clues as to the policies he will pursue if elected in November 2012. The article finds much common ground between the two candidates; both are results-driven pragmatists, attuned to nuance and complexity, who nonetheless believein agreement with Robert Kaganthat US geostrategic primacy will continue through the span of the twenty-first century. The gulf between the candidates on domestic policy is vast, but on foreign policyRomney's bellicose statements through the Republican primaries served a purpose that has passedthere is little between them.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Ahmed Akbar., 2013, THISTLE DRONE AMERIC
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, DANGEROUS NATION AM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, M ROMNEY DELIVERS RE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, RETURN HIST END DREA
  • [6] [Anonymous], COMMUNICATION
  • [7] Bacevich AndrewJ., 2012, The Short American Century: A Postmortem
  • [8] Becker Jo, 2012, NY TIMES 1121
  • [9] Brooks David, 2007, NY TIMES 1121
  • [10] NUCLEAR-WEAPONS AND THE ATLANTIC ALLIANCE
    BUNDY, M
    KENNAN, GF
    MCNAMARA, RS
    SMITH, G
    [J]. FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 1982, 60 (04) : 753 - 768