Contesting Hydropower Dams in the Eastern Himalaya: The Cultural Politics of Identity, Territory and Self-Governance Institutions in Sikkim, India

被引:20
作者
Dukpa, Rinchu Doma [1 ]
Joshi, Deepa [2 ]
Boelens, Rutgerd [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Environm Sci, Water Resources Management Grp, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Coventry Univ, Water Governance & Feminist Polit Ecol, Ctr Water Agroecol & Resilience, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Amsterdam, CEDLA Ctr Latin Amer Res & Documentat, Roetersstr 33, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Geog Planning & Int Dev Studies, Roetersstr 33, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
hydropower development; politicized collective identity; territory; collective action; agonistic unity; vernacular statecraft; Dzumsa; North Sikkim; COLLECTIVE ACTION; HYDROSOCIAL TERRITORIES; STRUGGLES; ANTHROPOLOGIST; IGNORANCE; JUSTICE; REGION; RIGHTS; PLACE;
D O I
10.3390/w11030412
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In India's Eastern Himalayan State of Sikkim, the indigenous Bhutia communities, Lachungpas and Lachenpas, successfully contested all proposed hydropower projects and have managed to sustain an anti-dam opposition in their home regions, Lachung and Lachen. In this paper, we discuss this remarkable, un-researched, effective collective action against hydropower development, examining how identity and territory influence collective action through production, creation and application of vernacular knowledge systems. The role of the Dzumsa, a prevailing traditional system of self-governance among the Lachungpas and Lachenpas, has been central in their collective resistance against large dams in Lachung and Lachen. Our findings show that contrary to popular imageries, the Dzumsa is neither an egalitarian nor a democratic institution-rather, it is an exercise of an "agonistic unity". The Dzumsas operate as complex collectives, which serve to politicize identity, decision-making and place-based territoriality in their struggle against internal and external threats. Principles of a "vernacular statecraft" helped bringing the local communities together in imperfect unions to oppose modernist designs of hydropower development. However, while such vernacular institutions were able to construct a powerful local adversary to neoliberal agendas, they also pose high social, political and emotional risks to the few within the community, who chose not to align with the normative principles of the collective.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory [J].
Agnew, John .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 1 (01) :53-80
[2]  
Agnew J, 2013, SPACES OF CONTENTION: SPATIALITIES AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, P121
[4]   Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action [J].
Alberici, Augusta Isabella ;
Milesi, Patrizia .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2016, 19 (01) :43-59
[5]   The 'Environmentalism of the Poor' revisited: Territory and place in disconnected glocal struggles [J].
Anguelovski, Isabelle ;
Martinez Alier, Joan .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 102 :167-176
[6]  
[Anonymous], THETHIRDPOLE
[7]  
[Anonymous], International Rivers
[8]  
[Anonymous], INDIAN EXPRESS
[9]  
[Anonymous], EC TIMES
[10]   Rethinking territory [J].
Antonsich, Marco .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 35 (03) :422-425