Reading abilities after cochlear implantation: The effect of age at implantation on outcomes at 5 and 7 years after implantation

被引:102
作者
Archbold, Sue [1 ]
Harris, Margaret [2 ]
O'Donoghue, Gerard [3 ]
Nikolopoulos, Thomas [4 ]
White, Alison [5 ]
Richmond, Hazel Lloyd [5 ]
机构
[1] Ear Fdn, Nottingham NG7 2FB, England
[2] Oxford Brookes Univ, Dept Psychol, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[3] Univ Nottingham Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[4] Univ Athens, ENT Dept, GR-10679 Athens, Greece
[5] Univ Nottingham Hosp, Nottingham Cochlear Implant Programme, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
关键词
Deaf children; Cochlear imptants; Reading; Literacy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.06.016
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The reading skills of deaf children have typically been delayed and this delay has been found to increase with age. This study explored the reading ability of a large group of children who had received cochlear implants 7 years earlier and investigated the relationship between reading ability and age at implantation. Methods: The reading ages of 105 children, with age at implantation less than 7 years and onset of deafness below the age of three, were assessed 5 and 7 years after implantation using the Edinburgh reading test. Net reading age was calculated by using the difference between chronological age and reading age. Non-verbal intelligence was measured for a subset of 71 children, using Raven's coloured progressive matrices. Further investigation of this subset looked at the association of nonverbal intelligence, age at implantation and reading ability. Results: There was a strong negative correlation at both 5 and 7 years after implant between net reading score and age at implantation. In the subset of 71 children who had an IQ score within normal range, those implanted at or before 42 months had age-appropriate reading both 5 and 7 years post-implant. This was not the case for children implanted after 42 months. Reading progress at the two post-implant assessment intervals were found to be highly related. Conclusions: Age at implantation was a significant factor in the development of reading skills in this group. In children implanted below the age of 42 months, reading progress was in Line with chronological age, which has not been the case previously with profoundly deaf children. With earlier implantation more common in present groups, and improved technology, there is every reason to be optimistic about the influence of cochlear implantation on the development of reading skills in deaf children. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1471 / 1478
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Allen Thomas, 1986, Deaf children in America, P161, DOI DOI 10.1177/15257401050270010201
[2]  
[Anonymous], VOLTA REV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Paediatric Cochlear Implantation
[4]   Approach to communication, speech perception and intelligibility after paediatric cochlear implantation [J].
Archbold, SM ;
Nikolopoulos, TP ;
Tait, M ;
O'Donoghue, GM ;
Lutman, ME ;
Gregory, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2000, 34 (04) :257-264
[5]  
Beech J. R., 2002, J RES READ, V20, P105, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1467-9817.00024, 10.1111/1467-9817.00024]
[6]   Behaviour and developmental effects of otitis media with effusion into the teens [J].
Bennett, KE ;
Haggard, MP ;
Silva, PA ;
Stewart, IA .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2001, 85 (02) :91-95
[7]   Postimplantation audition and educational attainment in children with prelingually acquired profound deafness [J].
Boothroyd, A ;
Boothroyd-Turner, D .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2002, 111 (05) :79-84
[8]   Some measures of verbal and spatial working memory in eight- and nine-year-old hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants [J].
Cleary, M ;
Pisoni, DB ;
Geers, AE .
EAR AND HEARING, 2001, 22 (05) :395-411
[9]  
Conrad R., 1979, DEAF SCH CHILD LANGU
[10]   Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: Risks versus benefits [J].
Dettman, Shani J. ;
Pinder, Darren ;
Briggs, Robert J. S. ;
Dowell, Richard C. ;
Leigh, Jaime R. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2007, 28 (02) :11S-18S