Arterial pulse cardiac output agreement with thermodilution in patients in hyperdynamic conditions

被引:39
作者
Della Rocca, Giorgio [1 ]
Costa, Maria Gabriella [1 ]
Chiarandini, Paolo [1 ]
Bertossi, Gaia [1 ]
Lugano, Manuela [1 ]
Pompei, Livia [1 ]
Coccia, Cecilia [1 ]
Sainz-Barriga, Mauricio [2 ]
Pietropaoli, Paolo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care Med, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Univ Udine, Surg Transplant Unit, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[3] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care Med, Rome, Italy
关键词
cardiac output; measurement techniques; arterial pulse contour analysis; thermodilution; pulmonary artery catheter; liver transplantation;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2008.02.021
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to compare continuous cardiac output (CCO) obtained using the arterial pulse wave (APCO) measurement with a simultaneous measurement of the intermittent cardiac output (ICO) and CCO obtained with a pulmbnary artery catheter (PAC) in liver transplant patients. Design: A prospective, single-center evaluation. Setting: A university hospital intensive care unit. Patients: Eighteen patients after liver transplantation. Interventions: Pulmonary artery catheters were placed in all patients, and ICO and CCO were determined using thermodilution. APCO measurements were made with the Vigileo System (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Measurements and Main Results: The authors obtained 126 data pairs of ICO and APCO and 864 pairs of CCO and APCO. ICO data were collected after intensive care unit admission and every 8 hours until the 48th postoperative hour. CCO and APCO data were collected every hour from admission until the 48th postoperative hour. Bias and precision were 0.95 +/- 1.41 L/min for ICO versus APCO and 1.29 +/- 1.28 L/min for CCO and APCO. Bias and precision for cardiac output (CO) data pairs less than 8 L/min were 0.32 +/- 1.14 L/min between ICO and APCO and 0.71 +/- 0.98 L/min between CCO and APCO. For CO data pairs higher than 8 L/min, bias and precision were 1.79 +/- 1.54 L/min between ICO and APCO and 2.25 +/- 1.14 L/min between CCO and APCO. Conclusions: APCO enables the assessment of CO with clinically acceptable bias and precision. At higher CO levels, APCO underestimates PAC measurements and it is not as reliable as thermodilution in hyperdynamic liver transplant patients. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 687
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Am Soc Anesthesiologists Task Forc, 2003, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V99, P988
[2]   Continuous cardiac output catheters -: Delay in in vitro response time after controlled flow changes [J].
Aranda, M ;
Mihm, FG ;
Garrett, S ;
Mihm, MN ;
Pearl, RG .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (06) :1592-1595
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Continuous cardiac output monitoring -: further applications of the thermodilution principle [J].
Böttiger, BW .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 25 (02) :131-133
[5]   Continuous versus intermittent thermodilution cardiac output measurement during orthotopic liver transplantation [J].
Bottiger, BW ;
Sinner, B ;
Motsch, J ;
Bach, A ;
Bauer, H ;
Martin, E .
ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (03) :207-214
[6]   Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery [J].
Breukers, Rose-Marieke B. G. E. ;
Sepehrkhouy, Shahrzad ;
Spiegelenberg, Stefan R. ;
Groeneveld, A. B. Johan .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2007, 21 (05) :632-635
[7]   Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Nigileo™ system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery [J].
Button, D. ;
Weibel, L. ;
Reuthebuch, O. ;
Genoni, M. ;
Zollinger, A. ;
Hofer, C. K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 99 (03) :329-336
[8]   Comparison of FloTrac™ cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements [J].
Cannesson, M. ;
Attof, Y. ;
Rosamel, P. ;
Joseph, P. ;
Bastien, O. ;
Lehot, J.-J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 24 (10) :832-839
[9]   Methodologies for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement: are we as good as we think we are? [J].
Cecconi, Maurizio ;
Grounds, Michael ;
Rhodes, Andrew .
CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 13 (03) :294-296
[10]   Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement in hyperdynamic conditions: pulmonary artery catheter vs. lithium dilution technique [J].
Costa, Maria Gabriella ;
Della Rocca, Giorgio ;
Chiarandini, Paolo ;
Mattelig, Silvia ;
Pompei, Livia ;
Barriga, Mauricio Sainz ;
Reynolds, Toby ;
Cecconi, Maurizio ;
Pietropaoli, Paolo .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 34 (02) :257-263