Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Interacts with Ambiguity During Sentence Comprehension

被引:1
作者
Key-DeLyria, Sarah E. [1 ]
Bodner, Todd [2 ]
Altmann, Lori J. P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Speech & Hearing Sci Dept, POB 751, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Portland State Univ, Dept Psychol, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation; Sentence processing; Shallow processing; Working memory; Executive function; WORKING-MEMORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY; COGNITIVE CONTROL; CAPACITY; INTELLIGENCE; RESOLUTION; LANGUAGE; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1007/s10936-018-09624-9
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Conventional opinion about using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) for examining sentence comprehension maintains that RSVP taxes working memory (WM), which probably affects sentence processing. However, most RSVP studies only infer the involvement of WM. Other cognitive resources, such as cognitive control or vocabulary may also impact sentence comprehension and interact with RSVP. Further, sentence ambiguity is predicted to interact with RSVP and cognitive resources to impact sentence comprehension. To test these relationships, participants read ambiguous and unambiguous sentences using RSVP and Whole-Sentence presentation, followed by comprehension questions that were targeted to the ambiguous region of the sentences. Presentation type and ambiguity interacted to affect RT such that the effect of RSVP was exaggerated for ambiguous sentences. RT effects were moderated by WM and vocabulary. WM and cognitive control affected accuracy. Findings are discussed in light of depth of processing and the impact of cognitive resources on sentence comprehension.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 682
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, NEW METHODS READING
[2]   Working memory and language: an overview [J].
Baddeley, A .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2003, 36 (03) :189-208
[3]   Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading [J].
Braze, David ;
Katz, Leonard ;
Magnuson, James S. ;
Mencl, W. Einar ;
Tabor, Whitney ;
Van Dyke, Julie A. ;
Gong, Tao ;
Johns, Clinton L. ;
Shankweiler, Donald P. .
READING AND WRITING, 2016, 29 (03) :435-451
[4]  
Caplan D, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P77
[5]   Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension [J].
Caplan, David ;
Waters, Gloria .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2013, 20 (02) :243-268
[6]   Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger [J].
Christianson, K ;
Hollingworth, A ;
Halliwell, JF ;
Ferreira, F .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 42 (04) :368-407
[7]   Effects of Plausibility on Structural Priming [J].
Christianson, Kiel ;
Luke, Steven G. ;
Ferreira, Fernanda .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2010, 36 (02) :538-544
[8]   Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide [J].
Conway, ARA ;
Kane, MJ ;
Bunting, MF ;
Hambrick, DZ ;
Wilhelm, O ;
Engle, RW .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2005, 12 (05) :769-786
[9]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466
[10]   Executive function and intelligence in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity: an individual differences investigation [J].
Engelhardt, Paul E. ;
Nigg, Joel T. ;
Ferreira, Fernanda .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (07) :1263-1281