Taxonicity of anxiety sensitivity: a multi-national analysis

被引:67
作者
Bernstein, A
Zvolensky, MJ
Kotov, R
Arrindell, WA
Taylor, S
Sandin, B
Cox, BJ
Stewart, SH
Bouvard, M
Cardenas, SJ
Eifert, GH
Schmidt, NB
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychol, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[4] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Madrid, Spain
[5] Univ Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[6] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS B3H 3J5, Canada
[7] Univ Lyon 2, F-69365 Lyon 07, France
[8] Univ New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[9] Chapman Univ, Orange, CA 92866 USA
[10] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.11.006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Taxometric coherent cut kinetic analyses were used to test the latent structure of anxiety sensitivity in samples from North America (Canada and United States of America), France, Mexico, Spain, and The Netherlands (total n = 2741). Anxiety sensitivity was indexed by the 36-item Anxiety Sensitivity Index-Revised (ASI-R; [J. Anxiety Disord. 12(5) (1998) 463]). Four manifest indicators of anxiety sensitivity were constructed using the ASI-R: fear of cardiovascular symptoms, fear of respiratory symptoms, fear of publicly observable anxiety reactions, and fear of mental incapacitation. Results from MAXCOV-HITMAX, internal consistency tests, analyses 4 simulated Monte Carlo data, and a MAMBAC external consistency test indicated that the latent structure of anxiety sensitivity was taxonic in each of the samples. The estimated base rate of the anxiety sensitivity taxon differed slightly between nations, ranging from 11.5 to 21.5%. In general, the four ASI-R, based manifest indicators showed high levels of validity. Results are discussed in relation to the conceptual understanding of anxiety sensitivity, with specific emphasis on theoretical refinement of the construct. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, TAXOMETRICS NEW DIAG
[2]  
Asmundson GJG, 1999, LEA SER PER CLIN PSY, P269
[3]   Fear of anxiety: Do current measures assess unique aspects of the construct? [J].
Asmundson, GJG ;
Norton, GR ;
Lanthier, NJ ;
Cox, BJ .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1996, 20 (05) :607-612
[4]   Is depression taxonic, dimensional, or both? [J].
Beach, SRH ;
Amir, N .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 112 (02) :228-236
[5]   Taxometrics and developmental psychopathology [J].
Beauchaine, TP .
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 15 (03) :501-527
[6]   Pseudotaxonicity in MAMBAC and MAXCOV analyses of rating-scale data: Turning continua into classes by manipulating observer's expectations [J].
Beauchaine, TP ;
Waters, E .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (01) :3-15
[7]   A comparison of maximum covariance and k-means cluster analysis in classifying cases into known taxon groups [J].
Beauchaine, TP ;
Beauchaine, RJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (02) :245-261
[8]   Fearful responding to repeated CO2 inhalation: A preliminary investigation [J].
Beck, JG ;
Shipherd, JC ;
Zebb, BJ .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1996, 34 (08) :609-620
[9]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216
[10]   Factor structure of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index among African American college students [J].
Carter, MM ;
Miller, O ;
Sbrocco, T ;
Suchday, S ;
Lewis, EL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1999, 11 (04) :525-533