A Comparison of Various Technological Options for Improving Energy and Water Use Efficiency in a Traditional Sugar Mill

被引:6
作者
Birru, Eyerusalem [1 ]
Erlich, Catharina [1 ]
Herrera, Idalberto [2 ]
Martin, Andrew [1 ]
Feychting, Sofia [3 ]
Vitez, Marina [3 ]
Abdulhadi, Emma Bednarcik [3 ]
Larsson, Anna [3 ]
Onoszko, Emanuel [3 ]
Hallersbo, Mattias [3 ]
Weilenmann, Louise [3 ]
Puskoriute, Laura [3 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Ind Technol & Management ITM, Dept Energy Technol, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Marta Abreu Las Villas UCLV, CEETA, Fac Mech & Ind Engn Cent, Santa Clara 54830, Cuba
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Ind Technol & Management ITM, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
sugar cane bagasse; Carlos Balino; energy efficiency; wastewater reuse; imbibition; CO2; emission; absorption chiller; pellet; electricity; energy saving; payback period;
D O I
10.3390/su8121227
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study is a comparison of four technological improvements proposed in previous works for the Cuban sugar mill Carlos Balino. These technological options are: (1) utilization of excess wastewater for enhanced imbibition; (2) utilization of waste heat for thermally driven cooling; (3) utilization of excess bagasse for pellets; and (4) modification of the cogeneration unit for maximum electric power generation. The method used for the evaluation of the technological options involves using criteria such as energy saving, financial gains, and CO2 emission saving potential. The results of the analysis show that the first three technological improvement options are attractive only during the crushing season. On the other hand, the last technological improvement option can be attractive if a year round generation of surplus power is sought. The first technological improvement option leads to only minor changes in energy utilization, but the increase in sugar yield of 8.7% leads to attractive profitability with an extremely low payback period. The CO2 emissions saved due to the fourth technological improvement option are the highest (22,000 tonnes/year) and the cost of CO2 emissions saved for the third technological improvement option (lowest) amount to 41 USD/tonne of CO2 emissions saved. The cycle efficiencies of the third and fourth technological improvement options are 37.9% and 36.8%, respectively, with payback periods of 2.3 and 1.6 years. The second technological improvement option is the least attractive alternative of the group.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Abdulhadi B.E., 2014, THESIS
[2]  
Alba D.S, 2014, EVALUACION ALTERNATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PAKISTAN OBSERVER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CUTT CARB EUR 2020 P
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CO2 EM FUEL COMB
[6]   Assessing the potential of energy saving in a traditional sugar cane mill during steady state and transient conditions-part I: base case plant model [J].
Birru, Eyerusalem ;
Erlich, Catharina ;
Beyene, Getachew Bekele ;
Martin, Andrew .
BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2016, 6 (02) :219-232
[7]  
Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association (UNICA), 2013, SUG ON PLANT MAN SOL
[8]  
Carpio C., 2010, ENERGY EFFICIENCY LA
[9]   Thermal gasification or direct combustion? Comparison of advanced cogeneration systems in the sugarcane industry [J].
Deshmukh, Ranjit ;
Jacobson, Arne ;
Chamberlin, Charles ;
Kammen, Dan .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 55 :163-174
[10]   Thermochemical characteristics of sugar cane bagasse pellets [J].
Erlich, C ;
Öhman, M ;
Björnbom, E ;
Fransson, TH .
FUEL, 2005, 84 (05) :569-575