Female genital mutilation: A global bug that should not cross the millennium bridge

被引:16
作者
Eke, N
Nkanginieme, KEO
机构
[1] Univ Port Harcourt, Teaching Hosp, Dept Surg, Urol Unit, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
[2] Univ Port Harcourt, Teaching Hosp, Dept Paediat, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s002689900627
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Female genital mutilation (FGM) has been practiced worldwide, clothed under the tradocultural term "circumcision." Indications for its practice include ensuring virginity, securing fertility, securing the economic and social future of daughters, preventing the clitoris from growing long like the penis, and purely as a "tradition." Outlawed only in the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Belgium, no law forbids it in most other countries. Classified into four identified types, the current perpetrators are mainly quacks, but trained medical personnel still connive at and encourage FGM. Early complications include hemorrhage, urinary tract infection, septicemia, and tetanus. Late complications include infertility, apareunia, clitoral neuromas, and vesicovaginal fistula. Reasons for the ritual persisting include fear that legislation would force it underground and it will be performed in unsterile conditions, belief that it is racist to speak out against FGM, "tolerance" by health professionals, continued use of the term "female circumcision," lack of awareness of the culture of immigrants by the physicians in areas where FGM is not culturally practiced, and sporadic or uncommitted eradication efforts. We believe there is no reason for the continued practice of FGM. It should incur global abolition, the same way slave trade or Victorian chastity belts have done. We advocate that in medical communications the term "female genital mutilation" be used in place of "female circumcision." World leaders should include unacceptable cultural practices such as FGM in the "world summit" agenda. The year 1999 should be declared the year for global eradication of FGM.
引用
收藏
页码:1082 / 1087
页数:6
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] ADAMSON F, 1993, FEMALE GENITAL MUTIL, P1
  • [2] Adinma J I, 1997, West Afr J Med, V16, P227
  • [3] Ahmed S, 1996, Nurs N Z, V2, P20
  • [4] ALLEN JR, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V274, P1714
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1986, WHO CHRON, V40, P31
  • [6] ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION ON THE GYNECOLOGICAL, GENITOURINARY AND OBSTETRICAL HEALTH-PROBLEMS OF WOMEN FROM SOMALIA - LITERATURE-REVIEW AND CASE SERIES
    ARBESMAN, M
    KAHLER, L
    BUCK, GM
    [J]. WOMEN & HEALTH, 1993, 20 (03) : 27 - 42
  • [7] ARMSTRONG S, 1991, NEW SCI, V129, P42
  • [8] FEMALE CIRCUMCISION - OBSTETRIC ISSUES
    BAKER, CA
    GILSON, GJ
    VILL, MD
    CURET, LB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (06) : 1616 - 1618
  • [9] BARBERA A, 1998, PROGETTO AMAZZONE UN, V2
  • [10] Female genital mutilation: Balancing intolerance of the practice with tolerance of culture
    Bashir, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 1997, 6 (01): : 11 - 14