Usability in a medical technology context assessment of methods for usability evaluation of medical equipment

被引:55
|
作者
Liljegren, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Prod & Prod Dev, Div Human Factors Engn, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
usability; usability tests; hierarchical task analysis; cognitive walkthrough; heuristic evaluation; medical technology;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2005.10.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The increased complexity of medical technology makes usability an important selection criterion when new equipment is purchased. However, this requires an understanding of what usability is in a medical technology context and what usability evaluation methods are suitable. A questionnaire was used to investigate what users of medical technology regard as the largest component of usability. The component 'difficult to make errors' was regarded as being 30% of overall usability. The components 'easy to learn', 'efficient to use',,easy to remember' made up 20% each of overall usability. Satisfaction only made up 10% of overall usability. Four common methods, hierarchical task analysis, cognitive walkthrough, heuristic evaluation and usability tests were evaluated according to thoroughness, validity, reliability, cost effectiveness and clarity. Usability tests are recommended to be the primary method in usability evaluations at hospitals, as they fulfil the criteria and address the 'difficult to make errors' aspect of overall usability. Hierarchical task analysis and cognitive walkthrough fulfil some criteria. Cognitive walkthrough also addresses the 'difficult to make errors' aspect.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 352
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A usability evaluation for telemedicine medical equipment
    Birkmire-Peters, DP
    Peters, LJ
    Whitaker, LA
    TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL, 1999, 5 (02): : 209 - 212
  • [2] Cognitive engineering methods as usability evaluation tools for medical equipment
    Liljegren, E
    Osvalder, AL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2004, 34 (01) : 49 - 62
  • [3] Augmented Reality Technology as a Tool for Better Usability of Medical Equipment
    Tavares Ribeiro, Jonatas Magno
    Martins, Juliano
    Garcia, Renato
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2018, VOL 3, 2019, 68 (03): : 341 - 345
  • [4] Assessment of Usability Evaluation Methods
    Riihiaho, Sirpa
    ECCE 2009 - EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS: DESIGNING BEYOND THE PRODUCT - UNDERSTANDING ACTIVITY AND USER EXPERIENCE IN UBIQUITOUS ENVIRONMENTS, 2009, 258 : 434 - 437
  • [5] Rapid Review of the Application of Usability Techniques in Medical Equipment
    Brandao, M. R.
    Garcia, R.
    XXVII BRAZILIAN CONGRESS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, CBEB 2020, 2022, : 2091 - 2097
  • [6] Comparison of Formative Evaluation Methods in the Usability Process on the Example of a Medical App
    Scholtes, Michael
    Noll, Katharina
    Sohrabi, Keywan
    Gross, Volker
    DHEALTH 2020 - BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH AND CARE, 2020, 271 : 101 - 107
  • [7] Dogmas in the assessment of usability evaluation methods
    Hornbaek, Kasper
    BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 29 (01) : 97 - 111
  • [8] Availability and usability of data for medical practice assessment
    Prins, H
    Kruisinga, FH
    Büller, HA
    Zwetsloot-Schonk, JHM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 14 (02) : 127 - 137
  • [9] Usability for medical devices
    Braun, S
    2005 IEEE Symposium on Product Safety Engineering (PSES), 2005, : 16 - 22
  • [10] Usability of home use medical technology: The patient perspective
    Tase, Arkeliana
    Buckle, Peter
    Ni, Melody Z.
    Hanna, George B.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2024, 29 (02): : 83 - 91