Computation of a drastic flow pattern change in an annular swirling jet caused by a small decrease in inlet swirl

被引:7
作者
Vanierschot, M. [1 ]
Van den Bulck, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mech Engn, Div TME, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
关键词
annular swirling flow; URANS; flow pattern change; HYSTERESIS; CLOSURE; NOZZLE;
D O I
10.1002/fld.1835
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the flow pattern change in an annular jet caused by a sudden change in the level of inlet swirl. The jet geometry consists of an annular channel followed by a specially designed stepped-conical nozzle, which allows the existence of four different flow patterns as a function of the inlet swirl number. This paper reports on the transition between two of them, called the 'open jet flow high swirl' and the 'Coanda jet flow.' It is shown that a small sudden decrease of 4% in inlet swirl results in a drastic and irreversible change in flow pattern. The objective of this paper is to reveal the underlying physical mechanisms in this transition by means of numerical simulations. The flow is simulated using the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) approach for incompressible flow with a Reynolds stress turbulence model. The analysis of the numerical results is based on a study of different forces on a control volume, which consists of the jet boundaries. The analysis of these forces shows that the flow pattern change consists of three different regimes: an immediate response regime, a quasi-static regime and a Coanda regime. The simulation reveals that the pressure-tangential velocity coupling during the quasistatic regime and the Coanda effect at the nozzle outlet during the Coanda regime are the driving forces behind the flow pattern change. These physical mechanisms are validated with time-resolved stereo-PIV measurements, which confirm the numerical simulations. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 592
页数:16
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, FLUENT 6 2 US GUID
[2]  
BATCHELOR GK, 1973, INTRO FLUID DYNAMICS, P543
[3]  
Beer J., 1983, COMBUSTION AERODYNAM, V2nd
[4]   GROUND EFFECTS ON PRESSURE-FLUCTUATIONS IN ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYER [J].
GIBSON, MM ;
LAUNDER, BE .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1978, 86 (JUN) :491-511
[5]  
Gupta AshwaniK., 1984, TUNBRIDGE WELLS
[6]   PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT OF A REYNOLDS-STRESS TURBULENCE CLOSURE [J].
LAUNDER, BE ;
REECE, GJ ;
RODI, W .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1975, 68 (APR15) :537-566
[7]   ASSESSMENT OF TURBULENCE-TRANSPORT MODELS INCLUDING NONLINEAR RNG EDDY-VISCOSITY FORMULATION AND 2ND-MOMENT CLOSURE FOR FLOW OVER A BACKWARD-FACING STEP [J].
LIEN, FS ;
LESCHZINER, MA .
COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 1994, 23 (08) :983-1004
[8]  
Pantakar S.V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow
[9]   TOWARDS THE ULTIMATE CONSERVATIVE DIFFERENCE SCHEME .5. 2ND-ORDER SEQUEL TO GODUNOVS METHOD [J].
VAN LEER, B .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1979, 32 (01) :101-136
[10]   ENHANCEMENTS OF THE SIMPLE METHOD FOR PREDICTING INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID-FLOWS [J].
VANDOORMAAL, JP ;
RAITHBY, GD .
NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER, 1984, 7 (02) :147-163