Proposal for a sustainability evaluation framework for bioenergy production systems using the MESMIS methodology

被引:16
作者
Valdez-Vazquez, Idania [1 ]
Sanchez Gastelum, Carolina del Rosario [2 ]
Escalante, Ana E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ingn, Unidad Acad Juriquilla, Blvd Juriquilla 3001, Queretaro 76230, Mexico
[2] Colegio Frontera Norte, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ecol, Lab Nacl Ciencias Sostenibilidad LANCIS, Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 045010, DF, Mexico
关键词
Biomass; Biofuels; Index; Indicators; Sustainability gradient; BIOFUELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.136
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The bioenergy economy promises to stimulate the local economic growth and improve the welfare of people living in rural areas. To accomplish this, there is global consensus on the sustainability indicators that must be evaluated in bioenergy production systems (BPSs). However, the utilization of these indicators has several constraints, such as their interpretation and application in developing countries in addition to the inherent complexity of BPSs. Here, we propose a sustainability framework applicable to BPSs. First, we use the framework for assessing the sustainability of the natural resource management systems (MESMIS) methodology to define a BPS and derive economic, environmental and social indicators. After that, we use the distance-to-target weighting method to describe a sustainability gradient of five levels for each indicator. Finally, we use the sustainability gradient to normalize the indicators and thereby weight and aggregate the indicators into a sustainability index (SI). After the application of the MESMIS methodology, a BPS was defined as three interrelated subsystems; 1) the biomass subsystem dedicated to the feedstock supply; 2) the transformation subsystem dedicated to convert the feedstock into bioenergy; and 3) the social subsystem that provides the workforce. This sustainability framework allows comparing two (or more) BPSs in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. A total of 7 economic indicators, 10 environmental indicators and 11 social indicators were described in terms of a sustainability gradient. The sustainability gradient converts the indicators to comparable units. Then, we propose to aggregate these indicators into three subindices by evaluated area: an economic subindex, an environmental subindex, and a social subindex. Each subindex ranges from 0 for an unsustainable BPS to 5 for a highly sustainable BPS. The SI integrates these three subindices, giving the same relevance to the economic, environmental and social areas.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 369
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aguirre S, 2009, AGROCIENCIA-URUGUAY, V13, P38
[2]  
Altieri M, 2007, ECOSISTEMAS, V1, P1
[3]  
Altieri M. A., 2002, Manejo Integrado de Plagas y Agroecologia, P17
[4]   Bioenergy and sustainable development: The dilemma of food security and climate change in the Brazilian savannah [J].
Alves Finco, Marcus Vinicius ;
Doppler, Werner .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 14 (03) :194-199
[5]  
[Anonymous], AN INT TECN CICL VID
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SUSTENTABILIDAD SIST
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, END CHILD LAB REACH
[8]  
Arias-Giraldo LM, 2007, CUENCA RIO LA VIEIA, P19
[9]  
ASTIER M, 2003, LEISA REV AGROECOLOG, P39
[10]  
Astier M., 2007, SUSTENTABILIDAD CAMP