No Difference in Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Mobile and Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement

被引：18

作者：

Biau, David J. ^{[1
]}

Greidanus, Nelson V. ^{[1
]}

Garbuz, Donald S. ^{[1
]}

Masri, Bassam A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Orthopaed, Div Lower Limb Reconstruct & Oncol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E3, Canada

来源：

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2013年 / 28卷 / 02期

关键词：

unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; mobile or fixed bearing; quality of life outcomes; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.017

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

This is a retrospective study comparing the clinical outcomes of mobile vs fixed medial unicompartmental knee replacements. Patients were identified from a prospectively collected database. Demographic data and pre- and postoperative outcomes (Oxford, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Short Form Health Survey-12, and satisfaction) were collected-104 knees (90 patients) with minimum 2-years of follow-up: 37 mobile and 67 fixed-bearing. At baseline, the median age was 60 years (mobile) and 66 (fixed); body mass index was significantly higher (32) for the mobile group than for the fixed (28). At follow-up, the groups differed only in the Oxford score: median 83 (mobile) and 90 (fixed). There is no difference in outcomes between mobile and fixed unicompartmental knee replacements.

引用

页码：220 / 226

页数：7

共 32 条

[1] TREATMENT OF PRIMARY OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP - A COMPARISON OF TOTAL JOINT AND SURFACE REPLACEMENT ARTHROPLASTY [J].

AMSTUTZ, HC ;

THOMAS, BJ ;

JINNAH, R ;

KIM, W ;

GROGAN, T ;

YALE, C .

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1984, 66A (02) :228-241

[2]

[Anonymous], 2010, R LANG ENV STAT COMP

[3]

BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833

[4] Statistics in brief:: The importance of sample size in the planning and interpretation of medical research [J].

Biau, David Jean ;

Kerneis, Solen ;

Porcher, Raphael .

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 466 (09) :2282-2288

[5] The wear of fixed and mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements [J].

Brockett, C. L. ;

Jennings, L. M. ;

Fisher, J. .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2011, 225 (H5) :511-519

[6]

CARR A, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P205

[7] Comparison of a mobile with a fixed tibial bearing unicompartimental knee prosthesis: a prospective randomized trial using a dedicated outcome score [J].

Confalonieri, N ;

Manzotti, A ;

Pullen, C .

KNEE, 2004, 11 (05) :357-362

[8] Predictors of functional outcome two years following revision hip arthroplasty [J].

Davis, AM ;

Agnidis, Z ;

Badley, E ;

Kiss, A ;

Waddell, JP ;

Gross, AE .

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (04) :685-691

[9]

Dawson J, 1988, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V63, P63

[10] Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant [J].

Emerson, RH ;

Hansborough, T ;

Reitman, RA ;

Rosenfeldt, W ;

Higgins, LL .

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (404) :62-70

← 1 2 3 4 →